Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Quality of Service, Efficiency and Scale in Network Industries: An analysis of European electricity distribution

By Christian Growitsch, Tooraj Jamasb and Michael G. Pollitt

Abstract

Quality of service is of major economic significance in natural monopoly infrastructure industries but is generally not reflected in efficiency analysis. In this paper we present an efficiency analysis of electricity distribution networks using a sample of about 500 electricity distribution utilities from seven European countries. We apply the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) method on multi-output translog input distance function models to estimate cost and scale efficiency with and without incorporating quality of service. We show that introducing the quality dimension into the analysis affects estimated efficiency significantly. In contrast to previous research, smaller utilities seem to indicate lower technical efficiency when incorporating quality. We also show that incorporating quality of service does not alter scale economy measures. Quality of service should be an integrated part of efficiency analysis and incentive regulation regimes, as well as in the economic review of market concentration in regulated natural monopolies

Topics: Classification-JEL: L15, L51, L94, efficiency, quality of service, scale economies, input distance function, stochastic frontier analysis.
Publisher: Faculty of Economics
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/131597
Provided by: Apollo

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1995). A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function, doi
  2. (2003). A Primer on Efficiency Measurement for Utilities and Transport Regulators, doi
  3. (1998). A Test for Natural Monopoly with Application to Norwegian Electricity Distribution, doi
  4. (1999). Accounting for Environmental Influences in Stochastic Frontier Models: With Application to International Airlines,
  5. (1989). Agency Costs and Innovation, doi
  6. (1998). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, doi
  7. (1998). Are Municipal Electricity Distribution Utilities Natural Monopolies?, doi
  8. (2003). Background to Work on Assessing Efficiency for the 2005 Distribution Price Control Review, scope study – final report prepared for OFGEM.
  9. (2005). Benchmarking and Incentive Regulation of Quality of Service: An Application to the UK Electricity Distribution Utilities, doi
  10. (2001). Benchmarking and Regulation: doi
  11. (1995). Benchmarking Developing Country Electricity Systems Using Data Envelopment Analysis,
  12. (1996). Confidence Statements for Efficiency Estimates from Stochastic Frontier Models, doi
  13. (1982). Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, doi
  14. (1953). Cost and Production Functions, doi
  15. (2004). Curvature-Constrained Estimates of Technical Efficiency and Returns to Scale for U.S. Electric Utilities, CEPA Working Paper Series,
  16. (2004). Economic Benchmarking and its Applications. In:
  17. (1996). Economies of Scale and Utilization in the Swiss Electric Power Distribution Industry, doi
  18. (1977). Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error, doi
  19. (2005). Electricity Distribution in the UK and Japan: A Comparative Efficiency Analysis 1985-1998, doi
  20. (1977). Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models, doi
  21. (1992). Identifying Multiple Outliers in Multivariate Data,
  22. (2003). International Benchmarking and Regulation: An Application to European Electricity Distribution Utilities, doi
  23. Main Economic Indicators. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, doi
  24. (1999). Measuring Scale Efficiency from a Translog Production Function,
  25. (2003). Measuring Scale Efficiency from the Translog Multi-Input, Multi- Output Distance Function, Working Paper 2003-25,
  26. (1995). Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications, doi
  27. (2000). Multiple Comparisons with the Best, with Economic Applications, doi
  28. (1977). On the Proper Cost Tests for Natural Monopoly in a Multiproduct Industry,
  29. (1995). Ownership and Performance in Electric Utilities, doi
  30. (2002). Parametric Decomposition of a Generalized Malmquist Productivity Index,
  31. (1984). Power Generation, Operation and Control, doi
  32. (2002). Price Regulation and Incentives, doi
  33. (1994). Productivity Differences in Multiple Output Industries: An Empirical Application to Electricity Distribution, doi
  34. (2001). Regional Differences in Electricity Distribution Costs and their Consequences for Yardstick Regulation of Access Prices, doi
  35. (2003). Regulation and Competition Policy in the Electricity Market: Economic analysis and German experience, doi
  36. (2004). Scale Economies and Efficiency in U.S. Agriculture: Are Traditional Farms History?, doi
  37. (2000). Scale Economies in Electricity Distribution – A Semiparametric Analysis, doi
  38. (2001). Scale Efficiency and Productivity Change,
  39. (2002). Stochastic Estimation of Firm Technology, Inefficiency, and Productivity Growth Using Shadow Cost and Distance Functions, doi
  40. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis, doi
  41. (1995). Testing for Subadditivity of Vertically Integrated Electric Utilities, doi
  42. (2004). The Case for International Coordination of Electricity Regulation: Evidence from the Measurement of Efficiency in South America, doi
  43. (2005). The Comparative Advantage of Public Ownership: Evidence from U.S. Electric Utilities, doi
  44. (2004). The Contestable Markets Theory: Efficient Advice for Economic Policy,
  45. (1996). The Effects of Incentive Regulation in The Telecommunications Industry: A Survey, doi
  46. (2003). The Effects of Incentive Regulation on Quality of Service in Electricity Markets, doi
  47. (1998). The Impact of State Incentive Regulation on the U.S. Telecommunications Industry,
  48. (1982). The Theory of Natural Monopoly, doi
  49. (1970). Theory of Cost and Production Functions, doi
  50. (1973). Transcendental Logarithmic Frontiers, doi
  51. (1977). Two Issues in Municipal Ownership of Electric Power Distribution Systems, doi
  52. (1994). Vertical Integration Efficiencies and Electric Utilities: A Cost Complementarity Perspective, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.