This article was published in the leading Czech journal of economics named “Politicka
Ekonomie” in 1967 that is during the process of Economic Reform intended to change
the Soviet-type Command Economy in a sort of Market Socialism. It was curious that
while the need to revive the market mechanism was accepted by the majority of
economists and politicians, the famous “Socialist Controversy” that was just about this
crucial problem was still virtually unknown in Czechoslovakia at that time. Our purpose
was not only to provide the basic information about that controversy, but also to put it in
the broader context of the evolution of the economic theory in the 19 th and 20 th century.
Because of the previous domination of the orthodox Marxist economics, any
developments of the non-Marxist economics after the classical contributions of Smith and
Ricardo were regarded as the attempts of the “bourgeoisie” to falsify the “true”
economics for the purpose of preserving Capitalism. We found it therefore necessary to
start with the explanation of neoclassical concepts of marginal utility, imputation of value
from final products to intermediate products and primary resources, as well as concepts
of general equilibrium. After explaining these “roots” of the controversy the critical
points of von Mises and Hayek are presented and the socialist responses of Maurice
Dobb, Oskar Lange, Abba Lerner and others are discussed with a clear aim to show that
without the market the socialist economy cannot be efficient
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.