Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Methodological reflections on the use of asynchronous online focus groups in health research

By Sarah Williams, Maria Giatsi Clausen, Ann Robertson, Susi Peacock and Kerri McPherson


The internet is increasingly used as a tool in qualitative research. In particular, asynchronous online focus groups are used when factors such as cost, time or access to participants can make conducting face-to-face research difficult. In this article we consider key methodological issues involved in using asynchronous online focus groups to explore experiences of health and illness. The written nature of internet communication, the lack of physical presence and the asynchronous, longitudinal aspects enable participants who might not normally contribute to research studies to reflect on their personal stories before disclosing them to the researcher. Implications for study design, recruitment strategies and ethics should be considered when deciding whether to use this method

Year: 2012
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    1. (2011). Alone Together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books, doi
    2. (2004). An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. doi
    3. (2002). and the AOIR ethics working committee (Approved by AOIR, doi
    4. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the internet. doi
    5. (1997). Conducting online focus groups. A methodological discussion. doi
    6. (2006). Cyberspace romance: The psychology of online relationships. doi
    7. (2007). Doing synchronous online focus groups with young people: Methodological reflections. doi
    8. (1998). E-mail: A qualitative research medium for interviewing. doi
    9. (2009). Enthrographic approaches to the Internet and computer-mediated communication. doi
    10. (2003). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AOIR ethics working committee. Retrieved from Etherington, doi
    11. (2005). Interaction in cyberspace: An online focus group. doi
    12. (2000). Internet communication in qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. doi
    13. (2010). Interviews and internet forums: A comparison of two sources of qualitative data. doi
    14. (2006). Investigating the “self” in deliberate self-harm. doi
    15. (2004). My way”: piloting an online focus group.
    16. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. doi
    17. (2005). Occupational therapy managers’ perceptions of challenges faced in early intervention service delivery in South Australia. doi
    18. (2007). Online data collection from gamblers: Methodological issues. doi
    19. (2009). Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-toinclude populations: examples from paediatric oncology. doi
    20. (2007). Phenomenological Psychology. doi
    21. (2007). Report of the working party on conducting research on the internet: Guidelines for the ethical practice in psychological research online.
    22. (1996). Researching Internet Communities: Proposed Ethical Guidelines for the Reporting of Results. The Information Society, doi
    23. (2005). Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research. doi
    24. (2003). retrieved from
    25. (2002). The “virtual focus group”: Using the internet to reach pregnant women on home bed rest. doi
    26. (1999). The British Psychological Society. Retrieved from
    27. (2006). The ethics of using the internet to collect qualitative research data. doi
    28. (2007). The pain experience of Hispanic patients with cancer in the United States. Oncology Nursing Forum, doi
    29. (2004). The Psychology of Cyberspace. Retrieved from
    30. (2007). Through the internet looking glass: Expressing and validating the true self. In
    31. (2003). Understanding the psychology of internet behaviour: Virtual worlds, real lives.
    32. (1997). Using focus groups in qualitative research. doi
    33. (2009). Using the internet for health-related activities: Findings from a national probability sample. doi
    34. (2005). Virtual focus groups: New frontiers in research.
    35. (2000). You know, who’s the thinnest?” Combating surveillance and creating safety in coping with eating disorders online. doi

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.