Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Symposium - How effective are brief motivational interviewing interventions : Are they necessary? Do they require enhancement? Can they be translated into routine clinical practice?

By Leanne Hides, Amanda Baker, Grant Christie and Kypros Kypri

Abstract

Brief interventions are effective for problem drinking and reductions are known to occur in association with screening and assessment. Design and methods: This study aimed to determine how much change occurred between baseline assessment and a one-session brief intervention (S1), and the predictors of early change among adults with comorbid depression and alcohol misuse (n=202) participating in a clinical trial. The primary focus was on changes in Beck Depression Inventory fastscreen scores and alcohol consumption (standard drinks per week) prior to random allocation to nine further sessions addressing either depression, alcohol, or both problems. Results: There were large and clinically significant reductions between baseline and S1, with the strongest predictors being baseline scores in the relevant domain and change in the other domain. Client engagement was also predictive of early depression changes. Discussion and Conclusion: Monitoring progress in both domains from first contact, and provision of empathic care, followed by brief intervention appear to be useful for this high prevalence comorbidity..

Topics: 170106 Health Clinical and Counselling Psychology, brief interventions, motivational interviewing, substance misuse, youth
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2012
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00514.x/pdf
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.qut.edu.au:57822

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.