Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Industrial Clusters in India: Evidence from Automobile Clusters in Chennai and the National Capital Region

By Aya Okada and N.S. Siddharthan


This study analyzes the patterns of agglomeration of some modern manufacturing sectors in India, and in particular the Indian automobile sector. It also examines and contrasts the factors that have led to different patterns of cluster development in two leading auto clusters in India-Chennai and the National Capital Region (NCR). Moreover, the study analyzes whether firms in clusters perform better than those that are excluded and whether the relative importance of variables that determine the behavior of firms differs among clusters. Our analyses, which employ a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, show that Indian industrial clusters are largely concentrated in the three clustered regions: NCR, Mumbai-Pune, and Chennai-Bangalore, across different manufacturing sectors. Our study of the auto clusters in Chennai and the NCR find considerable differences in the patterns of cluster formation, due partly to the historical and policy conditions under which firms, particularly, the lead firms must operate. Moreover, our econometric analyses confirmed that being part of a cluster positively influences the performance of the auto component firms and those belonging to a cluster perform better

Topics: Industrial clusters, Automobile industry, Spatial distribution of industry, India, Industrial estates, 産業クラスター, 自動車産業, インド, 工業地帯, 537.09, ASII India インド, L62 - Automobiles; Other Transportation Equipment, O14 - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology, R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity;, 338.964
Publisher: 日本貿易振興機構アジア経済研究所
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1057/9780230589520_5
OAI identifier: oai:ir:2344/548

Suggested articles


  1. (2004). A Flowchart Approach to Asia’s Industrial Cluster Policy,” doi
  2. (2004). Agglomeration and regional growth,” doi
  3. (1995). Agglomeration Benefits and Location Choice: Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Investments in the United States.’ doi
  4. (1985). Agglomeration economies in urban manufacturing industries: a case of Japanese cities”, doi
  5. (1999). Agglomeration effects in manufacturing location - are there any country's preferences?’
  6. (1997). Association for Indian Automobile Manufacturers (AIAM).
  7. (2002). Corruption and foreign direct investment”, doi
  8. (1989). Dislodging Multinationals: India’s Strategy in Comparative Perspective. doi
  9. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions?”, doi
  10. (1986). Efficiency of resource usage and city size”, doi
  11. (2004). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies”, in doi
  12. (2003). FDI facilitated by agglomeration economies: evidence from manufacturing and services joint ventures in China”, doi
  13. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment and the Transformation of Tamil Nadu’s Automotive Supply Base,
  14. (2002). Foreign Direct Investment in Tamil Nadu: Review and Comparison Across Host Sites,
  15. (2003). Geography, industrial organisation and agglomeration”, doi
  16. (2002). Global foreign direct investment flows: The role of governance infrastructure”, doi
  17. (1998). Globalization, FDI and the restructuring of supplier networks: the motor industry in Brazil and India,
  18. (2003). Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment,” doi
  19. (2000). How taxing is corruption on international investors?”, doi
  20. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography”, doi
  21. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth”, doi
  22. (2000). Indra Budiman and Paul Hidehiko Tanimura doi
  23. (1992). Industrial Efficiency in Six Nations, doi
  24. (2002). Information Costs, Agglomeration Economies and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in China’, Regional Studies. doi
  25. (2005). Innovation in regions: what does really matter?”, doi
  26. (1998). Intellectual and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises”, doi
  27. (1996). Inter-city competition for foreign investment: static and dynamic effects of China's incentive areas’, doi
  28. (2005). Knowledge base and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters”, doi
  29. (1994). Knowledge complementarity and innovation”, doi
  30. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey,” Industrial and Corporate Change. doi
  31. (1987). Learning to Industrialize: the Acquisition of Technological Capability in India. Basingstoke and London:
  32. (2002). Liberalisation, FDI and productivity spillovers – an analysis of Indian manufacturing firms”, doi
  33. (2003). Marshall’s scale economies”, doi
  34. (2004). MNEs strategic alliances and efficiency of firms: emerging trends in liberalizing
  35. (1996). Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, (Second Edition), Cambridge Survey of Economic Literature, doi
  36. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, doi
  37. (2000). Productivity spillovers from technology transfer to Indian manufacturing firms”, doi
  38. (1996). R&D spillovers and geography of innovation and production”, doi
  39. (1994). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition doi
  40. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy,” Industrial and Corporate Change. doi
  41. (2004). Skills development and interfirm learning linkages under globalization: lessons from the Indian automobile industry,” World Development, doi
  42. (2002). Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM).
  43. (1994). Spillovers and recipient firm size”, doi
  44. (1996). Technology transfer and industrial cooperation between India and Japan: Maruti and Suzuki”, A paper presented at a conference at Hitotsubashi University,
  45. Technology transfer by multinational firms", doi
  46. (1990). The Comparative Advantage of Nations. doi
  47. (1969). The Economics of Cities, Vintage,
  48. (2001). The geography of innovation and economic clustering: some introductory notes,” Industrial and Corporate Change. doi
  49. (2002). The location of Japanese investments in China: agglomeration effects, keiretsu, and firm heterogeneity’. doi
  50. (1982). The monopolistic advantages of multinationals: Lessons from foreign investment in the US", doi
  51. (1999). The Regional Distribution of Foreign Direct Investment in China”, doi
  52. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. doi
  53. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade, doi
  54. (1994). The theory of multinational plant location: agglomeration and disagglomerations”,
  55. (1997). TNCs, technology transfer and import of capital goods: Recent Indian experience”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.