Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Chairmanship in ASEAN+3:A Shared Rule of Behavior

By Sanae Suzuki

Abstract

ASEAN+3 is a cooperative framework among ASEAN members and the countries of Japan, China and Korea. It functions at the senior official, ministerial and summit levels. This article concerns how institutions in ASEAN+3 affect development of the direction and nature of this framework. ASEAN+3 is regarded as a loose framework that has regularized meetings as its main activity but has no organizational settings such as the secretariat. Little institutional analysis has been conducted on the development of this framework. This article introduces 'Chairmanship' as an analytical concept in which the chair or chairing member plays an important role in preparing and managing meetings. 'Chairmanship' is therefore an institution with an organizational element. It is also a shared rule of behavior among member states in that the chair's roles are not explicitly written in documents. Thus, it can be argued that the ASEAN+3 framework has an institution with an organizational element that affects development of its characteristics

Topics: ASEAN+3, Chairmanship, The chair, ASEAN, Preparation of meetings, Regional economic cooperation, International economic relations, Southeast Asia, Japan, China, South Korea, アセアン, 域内経済協力, 国際経済, 東南アジア, 日本, 中国, 韓国, 333.8, AECC China 中国, AEJA Japan 日本, AEKO South Korea 韓国, AH Southeast Asia 東南アジア, F15 - Economic Integration, 330.2
Publisher: 日本貿易振興機構アジア経済研究所
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:ir:2344/316

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1989). (eds) Legalization and World Politics, doi
  2. (2001). APEC Leaders Statement on Counter-Terrorism, 21 October,
  3. (2000). ASEAN and the Asian crisis: theoretical implications and practical consequences for Southeast Asian regionalism’, The Pacific Review doi
  4. (2003). ASEAN Plus Three: toward a new age of pan-East Asian regionalism? A skeptic’s appraisal’, The Pacific Review doi
  5. (2000). ASEAN+3 Shyunou Kaigi no Kekka Gaiyo’ [Summary of the ASEAN+3 summit], 24 November, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Japan. ʢ http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/kaidan/kiroku/s_mori/arc_00/asean00/gaiyo_1.html ʣ Last accessed on 23
  6. (2000). ASEM: Looking Forward, Looking Backward’, doi
  7. (2003). Constructing an ‘East Asian’ concept and growing regional identity: from EAEC to ASEAN+3’, The Pacific Review doi
  8. (2001). Council Guide: I. Presidency Handbook, Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  9. (1992). Decision-making in the European Community: The Council Presidency and European integration, doi
  10. (2004). East Asian Cooperation through Conference Diplomacy: Institutional Aspects of the ASEAN Plus Three (APT) Framework’,
  11. (2003). European Union Council Presidencies, doi
  12. (2002). Exploring alternative theories of economic regionalism: From trade to finance in Asian cooperation’, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation (CSGR) Working Paper No.
  13. (2002). Final Report of the East Asia Study Group.
  14. (2002). Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Between the Association of Southeast East Asian Nations and the People’s of Republic of China, 4 November, Phnom Penh,
  15. (2004). Higashi-Ajia ni okeru Shokuryo Anzen Hoshyo Kyouryoku no Shinten’ [Progress of Food Security Cooperation in East Asia],
  16. (2001). Higashi-ajia” Chiikishugi no Kanousei: ASEAN+3 (Nicchuukan) no Keii to Tenbo’ [Possibility of East Asia Regionalism: Process and Prospect of ASEAN+3
  17. (2003). Higashi-Ajia” to iu Shin-Chiiki Keisei no Kokoromi: ASEAN+3 no Tenkai’ [The Attempt to construct ‘East Asia’ as a new region:
  18. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: doi
  19. (1989). International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment, doi
  20. (2001). International Organizations, 3 rd edition, doi
  21. (2003). Japan as a Late-coming FTA Holder: Trade Policy Change for the Asian Orientation?’, in Okamoto, Jiro (ed) Whither Free Trade Agreements?: Proliferation, Evaluation and Multilateralization, Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies.
  22. (1997). Joint Statement of the Meeting of Heads
  23. (1999). Joint Statement on East Asia Cooperation,
  24. (2001). Legalization and Strategy: The Asia-Pacific Case’, doi
  25. (1981). Paths to Peace: The UN Security Council and Its Presidency, doi
  26. Sanae (2003a) ‘Yuruyakana Kyogitai ni okeru Gichyokokuseido no Igi’ [The Significance of Chairmanship in Loose Cooperative Body:
  27. Sanae (2003b) ‘Linkage between Malaysia’s FTA Policy and ASEAN Diplomacy.’ In Okamoto, Jiro (ed) Whither Free Trade Agreements?: Proliferation, Evaluation and Multilateralization. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies.
  28. (1991). Seoul APEC Declaration, Annex B in Joint Statement Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Ministerial Meeting,
  29. (1998). Tenth APEC Ministerial Meeting, Joint Statement, Kuala Lumpur,
  30. (2003). The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency’, doi
  31. (1967). The ASEAN Declaration (Bangkok Declaration), doi
  32. (1998). The Asian economic crisis: a study in the politics of resentment’, doi
  33. (2000). The East Asia Security Forum.’
  34. (2000). The Emerging ASEAN Plus Three Process: Another Building Block for Community Building in the Asia Pacific?’,
  35. (1983). The GATT and the regulation of trade barriers: regime dynamics and functions’, doi
  36. (1998). The presidency as Juggler: Managing Conflicting Expectations’,
  37. (1985). The Presidency of the European Council of Ministers,
  38. (2003). The social construction of international institutions: the case of doi
  39. (1997). Theories of International Regimes, Cambridge: doi
  40. (1987). Theories of international regimes’, doi
  41. (2000). Towards a tripartite world,’
  42. (2001). Towards An East Asian Community: Region of Peace, Prosperity and Progress, East Asia Vision Group
  43. (2003). Tsuka-Kinyu Kyouryoku to FTA ni miru Nihon no Higashi-Ajia Chiiki Keisei Senryaku’ [Japan’s Strategy in Financial Cooperation and FTA Policy for Constructing East Asia region],
  44. (2001). Two funerals and a wedding? The ups and downs of regionalism in East Asia and Asia-Pacific after the Asian crisis’, The Pacific Review doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.