Location of Repository

Has welfarist criminology failed? Juvenile justice and the human sciences in Victoria\ud \ud \ud

By David McCallum and Jennifer Laurence


In the present context of ‘get tough on crime’ and ‘back to criminal justice’ campaigns that continue to dominate political agendas throughout Australia, critics point to the inadequacy of ‘welfarist’ or reformist criminological and sociological theories that have informed interventions in the past, and reinforce the need for ‘retributive justice’ models of penal policy. This paper examines historical evidence on the role of the human sciences in juvenile justice administration during the 1940s, a formative time when psychiatric, psychological and social work expertise came together in the form of the Children’s Court Clinic in Victoria. It suggests that contemporary critiques about the failure of the welfare model of juvenile justice inadequately captures the historical functioning of expertise in justice administration and the real extent to which the welfare model as ‘actual rehabilitative intervention’ was ever implemented

Topics: School of Social Sciences and Psychology, 370000 Studies in Human Society, ResPubID13816, Juvenile justice, welfare, rehabilitative intervention, Victoria
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.vu.edu.au:1400

Suggested articles



  1. (1994). Actuarial Justice: the emerging new criminal law.
  2. (1991). Children and the State. Social control and the formation of Australian child welfare, Allen and Unwin,
  3. (2001). Condemn a little more, understand a little less': the political context and rights’ implications of the domestic and European rulings in the Venables-Thompson case,
  4. (2003). Conduct disorder – the achievement of a diagnosis,
  5. (1989). Corporatism: the third model of juvenile justice,
  6. (2001). Crime and Criminology. An Introduction,
  7. (2005). Crime and Justice Statistics, at www.aic.gov.au/stats/aust/vic.html, accessed 17
  8. (2004). Current trends in the rehabilitation of juvenile offenders,
  9. (2003). Danger of strong causal reasoning in juvenile justice policy and practice,
  10. (1945). Department of Human Services Archives. Children’s Court Clinic Case Files
  11. (1999). Evil, Age, 21 August. Australian Broadcasting Commission
  12. (1999). Governing the young.
  13. (1979). Laboratory Life: the social construction of scientific facts,
  14. (2004). Law and Norm. Justice administration and the human sciences in early juvenile justice in Victoria,
  15. (2001). Legal Informalism, Power and Liberal Governance,
  16. (1994). Neo-liberal crime control – political agendas and the future of crime prevention
  17. (1993). Offending Girls, Allen and Unwin, Sydney Castel R
  18. (2001). Personality and Dangerousness. Genealogies of antisocial personality disorder,
  19. (1993). Philosophies of juvenile justice,
  20. (1985). Punishment and Welfare: a history of penal strategies,
  21. (1956). Report of Juvenile Delinquency Committee (The Barry Report),
  22. (1976). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Child Care Services in Victoria (The Norgard Report), Government Printer,
  23. (1998). Rethinking Law and Order,
  24. (1992). Risk, power and crime prevention,
  25. (1999). Social justice after the “death of the social”,
  26. (2001). The awful choice,
  27. (1998). The case in social work: psychological assessment and social regulation.
  28. (1948). The development of intelligence in children.
  29. (1988). The Ideological Effects of Actuarial Practices,
  30. (1996). The limits of the sovereign state. Strategies of crime control in contemporary society,
  31. (1995). The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing.
  32. (1990). The Social Production of Merit. Education, psychology and politics in Australia 1900-1950,
  33. (1994). Trends in Juvenile Justice,
  34. (1998). Understanding Crime Prevention. Social control, risk and late modernity,
  35. (1986). Visualization and cognition: thinking with eyes and hands,
  36. (1999). Volatile and contradictory punishment,
  37. (2000). What makes a good juvenile justice system? A Discussion Document, at www.melb.catholic aust.com/agency/justic18.htm. Accessed 31/08/2001.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.