Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Should an Arbitration Provision Trump the Class Action? No: Permitting Companies to Skirt Class Actions Through Mandatory Arbitration Would be Dangerous and Unwise

By Jean R. Sternlight


Companies are deliberately using mandatory arbitration to prevent consumers and employces from joining together in class actions. As Carroll Neesemann has explained, eliminating the class action is a \u22strong incentive\u22 of those companies that impose the requirement of arbitration on consumers and employees. Mr. Neesemann defends this phenomenon, and his article offers companies and their attorneys some tips on how to effectively use arbitration to insulate themselves from the threat of class actions. By contrast, this essay argues that it is dangerous and unwise to permit companies to use mandatory arbitration to exempt themselves from class action suits

Topics: Mandatory, arbitration, consumers, employees, class actions, dangerous, unwise, ADR Scholarship, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Publisher: Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Law
Year: 2002
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.