Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Using imprecise estimates for weights.\ud

By A. Jessop


In multi-attribute decision problems the decision to differentiate between alternatives will be affected by the precision with which weights are specified. Specifications are imprecise because of the uncertainty characteristic of the judgements on which weights are based. Uncertainties are from two sources, the accuracy with which judgements are articulated and the inconsistency when multiple judgements are made and must be reconciled. These uncertainties are modelled using probabilistic weight estimates integrated by the Dirichlet distribution. This ensures the consistency of the estimates and leads to the calculation of significance of the differences between alternatives. A simple plot of these significant differences helps in the final decision whether this is selection or ranking. The method is used to find weight estimates in the presence of both types of uncertainty acting separately and together.\ud \u

Topics: Multi-criteria, Weights, Probability, Dirichlet.
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1057/jors.2010.46
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1998). A simulation approach for handling uncertainty in the analytic hierachy process. doi
  2. (1977). An Introduction to Risk Analysis.
  3. (2000). Attribute conflict and preference uncertainty: the RandMAU model. doi
  4. (1995). Consequences of uncertainty in the analytic hierarchy process: a simulation approach. doi
  5. (1990). Decomposition and the control of error in decision-analytic models.
  6. (2000). Distribution of aggregate utility using stochastic elements of additive multiattribute utility models. doi
  7. (2007). Eliciting probabilities from experts. In:
  8. (2005). Hämäläinen RP and Sahlo A
  9. (1999). Interval estimation in the AHP. doi
  10. (1968). Judgement estimates of the moments of PERT type distributions. doi
  11. (1992). Mathematical programming approaches to sensitivity calculations in decision analysis. doi
  12. (2003). Modelling, making inferences and making decisions: the roles of sensitivity analysis. doi
  13. (1978). Multidimensiional Scaling. Sage: Newbury Park CA and London.
  14. (2002). Prioritisation of an IT budget within a local authority. doi
  15. (1994). SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes doi
  16. (1996). The Analytic Hierarchy Process on an uncertain environment: a simulation approach. doi
  17. (1990). The costs and benefits of vague information.
  18. (2008). The Cult of Statistical Significance. doi
  19. (1970). The Significance Test Controversy: A Reader. doi
  20. (1983). Three-point approximations for continuous random variables. doi
  21. (1995). Uncertainty and imprecision: modelling and analysis. doi
  22. (2006). Using intervals for global sensitivity and worst-case analyses in multiattribute value trees.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.