Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Who's 'free riding'? A critique of the World Bank's approach to non-concessional borrowing in low income countries

By Celine Tan

Abstract

This paper considers the current proposals by the World Bank to curb the potential for ‘free riding’ in relation to financial support and multilateral debt relief to low-income countries. Measures to address the ‘free rider’ issue will form a pivotal plank in the World Bank’s future strategy towards low-income borrowing members and will also inform some of the International Monetary Fund (IMF)’s policies in this respect. This paper analyses the proposals in light of current trends in development financing policy and practice, particularly the shifting patterns of official and private financial flows to developing countries, and demonstrates the disjuncture between the conceptual approach of the Bank and Fund to the issue of ‘free riding’ and their operational practice over the past two decades. It is argued here that the Bank proposals are less motivated by a concern over the future debt sustainability of their low-income borrowers but by the realpolitik and financial exigencies facing the Bretton Woods institutions today. Consequently, the measures proposed are not only operationally flawed but represent instead new mechanisms to continue binding IDA countries to financing flows – and thereby financial discipline – by the Bank and the Fund during a time where these institutions are struggling to maintain their operational relevance and political legitimacy

Topics: HC, JZ, HJ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1897

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). 34 IDA doi
  2. (2005). Additions to IDA Resources: Fourteenth Replenishment Working Together to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals’, Report from the
  3. (2006). Akyüz, Yilmaz doi
  4. Celine Tan Who’s ‘Free Riding’? A Critique of the World Bank’s Approach to NonConcessional Borrowing in Low-Income Countries Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
  5. (2006). Comment: IDA and the ‘Free Rider’ Problem’, in DebtWatch: Debt Sustainability Special,
  6. (2005). Country Policy and Institutional Assessments: doi
  7. (2006). Debt Relief for the Poorest: An Evaluation Update of the HIPC Initiative. Washington DC: doi
  8. (2004). Debt Sustainability and Financing Terms
  9. (2004). Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countries: Policy and Resource Implications’. Paper submitted for
  10. (2005). Debt Sustainability in Low-Income Countries: Further Considerations on an Operational Framework and Policy Implications’,
  11. (2004). Debt Sustainability in Low-Income Countries: Proposal for an Operational Framework and Policy Implications’,
  12. (1998). Drowning by Numbers: The IMF, the World Bank and North-South Financial Flows. London: Bretton Woods Project.
  13. (1999). External Debt Reporting and Financial Statements’, Operational Policy 14.10,
  14. (2005). General Conditions for Credit and Grants’.
  15. Gilles Quentel The Translation of a Crucial Political Speech: G.W.Bush’ State of the Union Address
  16. (2006). http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/DEVCOMMEXT/0,,content MDK:20898375~menuPK:64060743~pagePK:64000837~piPK:64001152~theSite PK:277473,00.html (6
  17. (2005). Operational Framework for Debt Sustainability Assessments in Low-Income Countries: doi
  18. (2005). Reforming the IMF: Back to the Drawing Board’, TWN Global Economy Series 7. Penang: Third World Network.
  19. (2006). Review of Low-Income Country Debt Sustainability Framework and doi
  20. (2002). Rogue Creditors, including Iraq and Taiwan, Threaten HIPC’.
  21. (2005). Still Missing the Point: unpacking the New World Bank/IMF Debt Sustainability Framework’, Eurodad Briefing Paper,
  22. (2000). The Dynamic Evolution of International Organizations: The Case of the World Bank’, doi
  23. (2005). The Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative: Implementation Modalities for IDA’,
  24. (2003). The Paris Club and International Economic Governance’. In Aggarwal, Vinod K and Granville, Brigitte (eds). Sovereign Debt: Origins, Crises and Restructuring. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
  25. (2005). The Policy Support Instrument’. doi
  26. (2004). The World Bank as ‘Judge and Jury’: The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA)
  27. (2004). To Lend or to Grant? A Critical View of the IMF and World Bank’s Proposed Approach to Debt Sustainability Analyses for Low-Income Countries’, Working Paper for CAFOD, Trocaire, Oxfam and Actionaid International –
  28. (1998). Trade and Development Report 1998: Financial Instability,
  29. (1995). Why is there Multilateral Lending ?’ Working Paper 5160, NBER Working Paper Series, doi
  30. (2005). World Economic and Social Survey 2005: Financing for Development.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.