Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Forecast encompassing tests and probability forecasts

By Michael P. Clements and David Ian Harvey


We consider tests of forecast encompassing for probability forecasts, for both quadratic and logarithmic scoring rules. We propose test statistics for the null of forecast encompassing, present the limiting distributions of the test statistics, and investigate the impact of estimating the forecasting models’ parameters on these distributions. The small-sample performance of the various statistics is investigated, both in terms of small numbers of forecasts and model estimation sample sizes. Two empirical applications show the usefulness of the tests for the evaluation of recession probability forecasts from logit models with different leading indicators as explanatory variables, and for evaluating survey-based probability forecasts

Topics: HB
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Year: 2006
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). A re-examination of the predictability of economic activity using the yield spread. NBER Working Papers, doi
  2. (2001). A real-time data set for macroeconomists. doi
  3. (1996). Asymptotic inference about predictive ability. doi
  4. (1989). Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. doi
  5. (1999). Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. doi
  6. (1986). Combining probability distributions: A critique and an annotated bibliography. doi
  7. (1998). Combining qualitative forecasts using logit. doi
  8. (1993). Comment on ‘On the limitations of comparing mean squared forecast errors’, by M.P. Clements doi
  9. (1990). Comparing information in forecasts from econometric models. doi
  10. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. doi
  11. (1986). Econometric evaluation of linear macro-economic models. doi
  12. (2000). Economic and statistical measures of forecast accuracy. doi
  13. (2003). Exchange rate forecasting: The errors we’ve really made. doi
  14. (1996). Forecast evaluation and combination. doi
  15. (2002). Forecasting combination and encompassing. doi
  16. (2006). Forecasting evaluation. doi
  17. (1990). Modelling Economic Series. doi
  18. (2005). News and noise in G-7 GDP announcements. doi
  19. (1983). Oil and the Macroeconomy since World War II. doi
  20. (1989). Oil and the Macroeconomy when prices go up and down: An extension of Hamilton’s results. doi
  21. (1995). Oil shocks and the macroeconomy: The role of price variability. doi
  22. (2002). Predicting a recession: evidence from the yield curve in the presence of structural breaks. doi
  23. (2001). Predicting the probability of a recession with nonlinear autoregressive leading indicator models.
  24. (1999). Predicting U.S. business cycle regimes. doi
  25. (1998). Predicting US recessions: Financial variables as leading indicators. doi
  26. (1986). Probability forecasting. doi
  27. (1952). Rational decisions. doi
  28. (1998). Regression-based tests of predictive ability. doi
  29. (1996). Scoring rules and the evaluation of probabilities (with discussion).
  30. (1989). Scoring the leading indicators. doi
  31. (1973). Some comments on the evaluation of economic forecasts. doi
  32. (2001). Tests for forecast encompassing when forecasts depend on estimated regression parameters. doi
  33. (1998). Tests for forecast encompassing. doi
  34. (2001). Tests of equal forecast accuracy and encompassing f o rn e s t e dm o d e l s doi
  35. (1972). The prediction performance of the FRB-MIT-PENN model of the US economy.
  36. (2003). The use and abuse of real-time data in economic forecasting. doi
  37. (1996). This is what happened to the oil price-macroeconomy relationship. doi
  38. (1998). Unemployment equilibria and input prices: Theory and evidence from the United States. doi
  39. (1950). Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. doi
  40. (2000). What is an Oil Shock?. doi
  41. (1996). Whatever happened to the oil price-macroeconomy relationship?. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.