Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Centralisation of assessment: meeting the challenges of\ud multi-year team projects in information systems\ud education

By GS Cooper and A Heinze

Abstract

This paper focuses on the difficulties of assessing multi-year team projects, in which a team of students drawn from all three years of a full-time degree course works on a problem with and for a real-life organization. Although potential solutions to the problem of assessing team projects may be context-dependent, we believe that discussing these in our paper will allow readers\ud to relate to their teaching cases and increase the general appreciation of team project related work. Findings discussed in this paper are based on the first cycle of action research in relation to an existing multi-year team project scheme. Based on the interpretivist perspective, this work draws on data from staff and student focus groups, semi structured interviews and surveys.\ud Team project clients were also asked to comment on their experiences and the way they would like team projects to be\ud improved in the future. Since issues affecting the success of team projects are quite closely inter-related, a systemic view is adopted rather than analysis of a single issue in isolation. Overall there is a feeling that multi-year team projects are a good idea in theory but can be challenging to implement in practice. It is argued that the main areas of concern are the assessment process, the dilemmas and tensions that it can introduce, and the related inconsistencies in stakeholder involvement, which can compromise the learning experience if not handled well. We believe that the assessment process holds the key to a successful learning experience in team project work

Topics: QA75, LB2300, other
Publisher: Edsig (Educators Special Interest Group)
OAI identifier: oai:usir.salford.ac.uk:1662

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1997). A Review on the Use of Action Research
  2. (1965). A social History of Education.
  3. (2004). Addressing Commercial Realism and Academic Issues In GroupBased IS Undergraduate Project Work."
  4. (1992). Assessing more students.
  5. (1981). Cognitive and Ethical Growth: The Making of Meaning. The Modern American College.
  6. (2005). Competency Matrices for Peer Assessment of Individuals in Team Projects.
  7. (1997). Developing work based transferable skills in a university environment."
  8. (2003). Do industry collaborative projects enhance students' learning?" doi
  9. (2007). Enid Mumford Biography,
  10. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme.
  11. (2003). Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificy of criteria in peer assessments."
  12. (2007). Information technology team projects in higher education: An international viewpoint."
  13. (2000). Introduction to research methods.
  14. (2006). It's not fair!" Assessing the dynamics and resourcing of teamwork." doi
  15. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings."
  16. (1985). Research Methods in Information Systems: Using Action Research. Research Methods in Information Systems. doi
  17. (2002). Review of current pedagogic research and practice in the fields of postcompulsory education and lifelong learning. London, The Tavistock Institute.
  18. (2004). Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice - foreword."
  19. (2001). Synthesizing Research and Practice: Using the Action Research Approach in Health Care settings. The business of research; issues and policy
  20. (1994). System Dynamics, Systems Thinking, and Soft OR."
  21. (2005). Teaching with and through teams: Student-written, instructor facilitated case writing and the signatory code."
  22. (2001). The importance and the ivasiveness of student team selection criteria."
  23. (1987). Towards the Definition of Action Research: A Note and Bibliography."

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.