Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Research into aerodynamic modulation of wind turbine noise:\ud final report

By AT Moorhouse, M Hayes, S von Hünerbein, BJ Piper, MD Adams, University of Salford, Audio and Video Group Acoustics, Hayes McKenzie Partnership, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Department for Business and Food and Rural Affairs Department for Environment


The study described in this report has been commissioned by Defra, BERR (formerly DTI) and CLG. It follows on from a report by the Hayes McKenzie Partnership to DTI in 2005 in which reports of low frequency noise emission from windfarms were investigated. Their report concluded that the complaints were not caused by low frequency noise, but by amplitude modulation of aerodynamic noise (AM) from the wind turbines. The term AM indicates aerodynamic noise from wind turbines, but with a greater than normal degree of regular fluctuation at blade passing frequency, typically once per second. The aims of this current study are to ascertain the prevalence of AM on UK wind farm sites, to try to gain a better understanding of the likely causes, and to establish whether further research into AM is required. The study was carried out in four parts, a survey of local authorities with windfarms in their areas, further investigation of sites for which AM was identified as a factor, a literature review and a survey of wind turbine manufacturers.\ud \ud The survey of local authorities was in two parts, a scoping survey aimed at identifying problem sites, and a detailed survey to establish whether AM could have been a factor in causing complaints. The response to both parts of the survey was 100%, although full information was not available for all sites at the detailed stage. The results showed that 27 of the 133 windfarm sites operational across the UK at the time of the survey had attracted noise complaints at some point. An estimated total of 239 formal complaints have been received about UK windfarm sites since 1991, 152 of which were from a single site. The estimated total number of complainants is 81 over the same sixteen year period. This shows that in terms of the number of people affected, wind farm noise is a small-scale problem compared with other types of noise; for example the number of complaints about industrial noise exceeds those about windfarms by around three orders of magnitude. In only one case was the windfarm considered by the local authority to be causing a statutory nuisance. Again, this indicates that, despite press articles to the contrary, the incidence of windfarm noise and AM in the UK is low.\ud \ud AM was considered to be a factor in four of the sites, and a possible factor in another eight. Regarding the four sites, analysis of meteorological data suggests that the conditions for AM would prevail between about 7% and 15% of the time. AM would not therefore be present most days, although it could occur for several days running over some periods. Complaints have subsided for three out of these four sites, in one case as a result of remedial treatment in the form of a wind turbine control system. In the remaining case, which is a recent installation, investigations are ongoing.\ud \ud The literature review indicated that, although there has been much research into the general area of aerodynamic noise it is a highly complex field, and whilst general principles are understood there are still unanswered questions. Regarding the specific phenomenon of AM there has been little research and the causes are still the subject of debate. AM is not fully predictable at current state of the art. The survey of wind turbine manufacturers revealed that, although there was considerable interest, few have any experience of AM.\ud \ud The low incidence of AM and the low numbers of people adversely affected make it difficult to justify further research funding in preference to other more widespread noise issues. On the other hand, since AM cannot be fully predicted at present, and its causes are not fully understood we consider that it might be prudent to carry out further research to improve understanding in this area

Topics: QC221246, other
Publisher: Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). A Mathematical Model For Wind Turbine Blades."
  2. (2007). A review of wind energy technologies."
  3. (2005). A Review Of Wind Turbine Noise. Wind Turbine Noise,
  4. (2003). Acoustic performances of a vertical board for wind turbine noise immission measurements."
  5. (1991). Aeroacoustics of large wind turbines."
  6. (2005). An aerodynamic noise propagation model for wind turbines."
  7. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing(5th Edition)”
  8. (2002). An overview of wind energy-status
  9. (2005). Analysis Of The Sound Characteristics Of Large Stall-Controlled Wind Power Plants In Inland Locations. Wind Turbine Noise,
  10. (2006). Application of a Ray Theory Model to the Prediction of Noise Emissions from Isolated Wind Turbines and Wind Parks."
  11. (2003). Assessment of wind-generation potentiality in Jordan using the site effectiveness approach."
  12. (2006). Broadband noise radiation analysis for an HAWT rotor." Renewable Energy doi:10.1016/j.renene.2006.10.002.
  13. (2006). Cylinder wake influence on the tonal noise and aerodynamic characteristics of a NACA0018 airfoil."
  14. (2004). Development of the Risø Wind Turbine Airfoils."
  15. (1994). Downwind propagation of sound in an atmosphere with a realistic sound-speed profile: A semianalytical ray model.
  16. (2003). Economic and technical issues affecting the development of the wind-power industry in Poland."
  17. (2003). Effects of splitting a ground board on wind turbine noise measurements."
  18. (2004). Effects of the wind profile at night on wind turbine sound."
  19. (2002). Factors affecting public acceptance of wind turbines in Sweden. Mölndal, Lunds Universitet.
  20. Farms and Noise.
  21. (2005). How The "Mythology" Of Infrasound And Low Frequency Noise Related To Wind Turbines Might Have Developed. Wind Turbine Noise,
  22. (2005). Human Response To Wind Turbine Noise – Annoyance And Moderating Factors. Wind Turbine Noise,
  23. (2005). Infrasound Emission from Wind Turbines."
  24. K.(2000) A turbulence spectral model for sound propagation in the atmosphere that incorporates shear and buoyancy forcings. doi
  25. (2005). Localisation And Quantification Of Noise Sources On A Wind Turbine. Wind Turbine Noise,
  26. (2006). Location, Location, Location: An investigation into wind farms and noise by The Noise Association, The Noise Association.
  27. (2004). Long time measurements of noise from wind turbines."
  28. (2006). Low Frequency Noise
  29. (2005). Masking Of Wind Turbine Sound By Vegetation Noise. Wind Turbine Noise,
  30. (2005). Mitigation measures for night-time wind turbine noise. Wind Turbine Noise,
  31. (2005). Modelling of noise from wind farms and evaluation of the noise annoyance. Wind Turbine Noise,
  32. (2002). Modelling the Atmospheric Absorption of Wind Turbine Noise." doi
  33. (2003). Noise annoyance from wind turbines - a review,
  34. (2005). Noise Of Wind Power Turbine V80 In A Farm Operation. Wind Turbine Noise,
  35. (2004). Notes on Low Frequency Noise from Wind Turbines with special reference to the Genesis Power Ltd Proposal, near Waiuku NZ, Genesis Power/ Hegley Acoustic Consultants.
  36. (2004). Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise—a dose–response relationship."
  37. (2002). Planning Advice Note 45: Renewable Energy:
  38. (2004). Planning Policy Statement 22: Renewable Energy
  39. (1996). Processes of buffeting and vortex forces in turbulent wind."
  40. (2005). Public Attitudes to Wind Energy in the UK,
  41. (2002). Public attitudes to wind energy in Wales, Friends of the Earth Cymru.
  42. Public Attitudes to Wind farms,
  43. Public Attitudes Towards Wind Power, Danish Wind Industry Association.
  44. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  45. (2005). Sirocco: Silent Rotors By Acoustic Optimisation. Wind Turbine Noise,
  46. (2004). Smoothing Effects of Distributed Wind Turbines. Part 1. Coherence and Smoothing Effects at a Wind Farm."
  47. (2005). Technical Advice Note 8: Planning for Renewable Energy: National Assembly for
  48. (1997). The assessment and rating of noise from wind farms:
  49. (2005). The Beat is Getting Stronger: The Effect of Atmospheric Stability on Low Frequency Modulated Sound of Wind Turbines." doi
  50. (2006). The measurement of low frequency noise at three UK wind farms: URN No: 06/1412” issued by the DTI
  51. (1991). The prediction of propagation of noise from wind turbines with regard to community disturbance’. Contract report for ETSU
  52. (2006). The sound of high winds: the effect of atmospheric stability on wind turbine sound and microphone noise: (26/3/2007)
  53. (1996). Tutorial on sound propagation outdoors”,
  54. (2005). Two-Medium Theory Of Aerodynamic Sound Sources And The Practical Problems Of Wind Turbine Noise. Wind Turbine Noise,
  55. (2007). Wind electricity in Denmark: A survey of policies, their effectiveness and factors motivating their introduction." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  56. (1998). Wind Energy and Landscape.
  57. (1997). Wind Energy Conversion: From Theory to Practice.
  58. (2001). Wind Energy Literature Survey No. 2."
  59. (2003). Wind Energy Literature Survey No. 4."
  60. (2000). Wind Energy Literature Survey No.1."
  61. (2005). Wind gradient statistics up to 200 m altitude over flat ground. Wind Turbine Noise,
  62. (2007). Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’." doi
  63. (2006). Wind Turbine Acoustic Noise. Amherst, Renewable Energy Research Laboratory.
  64. (2000). Wind Turbine Environmental Assessment. Toronto, Toronto Hydro and TREC.
  65. (1996). Wind Turbine Noise: doi
  66. (1998). Wind turbine technology – Fundamental concepts of wind turbine engineering.
  67. (2003). Wind turbines at night: acoustical practice and sound research."

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.