A function f: Fn2 → {0, 1} is triangle-free if there are no x1, x2, x3 ∈ Fn2 satisfying x1 + x2 + x3 = 0 and f (x1) = f (x2) = f (x3) = 1. In testing triangle-freeness, the goal is to distinguish with high probability triangle-free functions from those that are ε-far from being triangle-free. It was shown by Green that the query complexity of the canonical tester for the problem is upper bounded by a function that depends only on ε (GAFA, 2005), however the best known upper bound is a tower type function of 1/ε. The best known lower bound on the query complexity of the canonical tester is 1/ε13.239 (Fu and Kleinberg, RANDOM, 2014). In this work we introduce a new approach to proving lower bounds on the query com-plexity of triangle-freeness. We relate the problem to combinatorial questions on collections of vectors in ZnD and to sunflower conjectures studied by Alon, Shpilka, and Umans (Comput. Complex., 2013). The relations yield that a refutation of the Weak Sunflower Conjecture over Z4 implies a super-polynomial lower bound on the query complexity of the canonical tester for triangle-freeness. Our results are extended to testing k-cycle-freeness of functions with do-main Fnp for every k ≥ 3 and a prime p. In addition, we generalize the lower bound of Fu and Kleinberg to k-cycle-freeness for k ≥ 4 by generalizing the construction of uniquely solvable puzzles due to Coppersmith and Winograd (J. Symbolic Comput., 1990).
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.