Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

European Food Safety Authority - risk communication annual review

By Jamie Wardman and Ragnar Lofstedt

Abstract

This research report was commissioned by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to provide an independent review of the Authority's risk communication activities in relation to the safety of food in four cases: GMOs; BSE in goats; mercury in wild and farmed fish; and semicarbazide in baby food. The review first outlines the historical context to communicating food risks in Europe before setting out three fundamental principles for effectively communicating risk. These principles concern: creating appropriate risk communication channels; the credibility of communications; and the efficient delivery of decision relevant information. These principles are used to develop normative criteria against which to evaluate EFSA's risk communications for each of the four cases. The review concludes by providing a number of key recommendations to help EFSA further improve and professionalize the Authority's risk communication activities

Topics: P210 Public Relations, C800 Psychology, P990 Mass Communications and Documentation not elsewhere classified, N620 Health and Safety Issues, L241 European Union Politics
Publisher: European Food Safety Authority
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lincoln.ac.uk:2139

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk-Based, Precaution-Based and Discourse-Based Management,” Risk Analysis, doi
  2. (2004). Consumption and its discontents: addiction, identity and the problems of freedom‟, doi
  3. (2001). Defining stigma.
  4. (2007). Europeanising advisory expertise: the role of „independent, objective and transparent‟ scientific advice in agri-biotech regulation, Environment and Planning C: Government and Politics doi
  5. (2004). Europeans‟ trust in food highest for fruits and vegetables, lowest for junk food.
  6. (2003). Flaws undermine results of UK biotech debate. doi
  7. (1988). Food, self and identity, doi
  8. (2005). Friends of the Earth doi
  9. Friends of the Earth (2004) Press Release:
  10. (2004). Global assessment of organic contaminants in farmed salmon. doi
  11. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. doi
  12. (2005). Industry‟s need and expectations to meet food safety, 5 th International Meeting: Noordwijk Food Safety and HACCP Forum doi
  13. (2005). Information specificity and hazard risk potential as moderators of trust asymmetry. doi
  14. (1995). Of mad cows and marmosets: From rational choice to organisational behaviour in crisis management. doi
  15. (1996). Public perceptions of everyday hazards: a psychometric study.
  16. (1994). Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: an empirical study. doi
  17. (2003). Restrained support for EFSA. www.foodnavigator.com/FinancialIndustry/Restrained-support-for-EFSA Retrieved 2009-05-27 BEUC (2003) Press Release: Good Luck Mr. Geoffrey Podger! 03
  18. (1994). Risk and Responsibility. doi
  19. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality, Risk Analysis, doi
  20. (2001). Risk communication: The mental models approach. New York: doi
  21. (1995). Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 15 Fischhoff, B. doi
  22. (2001). The BSE Inquiry: The report. The inquiry into BSE and CJD in the United Kingdom. London: The Stationary Office.
  23. (2004). The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA): Failing Consumers and the Environment.
  24. (1998). The re-emergence of BSE: The impacts of public beliefs and behaviour. Risk and Human Behaviour Newsletter, n.3
  25. (2006). Towards a Critical Discourse on Affect and Risk Perception. doi
  26. (2005). Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? doi
  27. (1997). Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics and Science: Surveying the Risk assessment Battlefield‟ doi
  28. (2003). Trust, transparency and social context. In N.Pidgeon, R.E.Kasperson and P.Slovic eds. The Socail Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: doi
  29. (1999). Urban angler‟s perceptions of risk and contaminated fish. doi
  30. (2001). Will they hate us? Anticipating unacceptable risks. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.