Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Institutional effects on skill premium

By Fei Peng


Skill premium in the United Kingdom has increased substantially since the 1970s. This paper analyzes the link between institutions and the skill premium in the UK controlling for other explanatory variables such as market conditions, international trade and skill-biased technology. For the private sector, institutions are more important for the unskilled baseline group than the skilled groups. The trade union decline after 1979 brings different effect on wages of skilled and unskilled workers and pushes the skill premium up. We find that the trade union decline in unskilled workers can explain about one third degree premium increase over the period 1979-1998. The overall effect of trade union in all workers can explain about 13.34 percent of degree premium increase during the same period. Our results are insensitive to skill group categorization. Moreover, we find that minimum wages can only decrease skill premiums of high skilled workers rather than low skilled workers. The increase of unemployment benefit over the period 1979-1998 reduces the increasing the skill premium by about 13.6 percent. But, the mark-up effect of taxation increase skill premium by about 8.26 percent. We find no significant associations between above institutions and skill premiums in the public sector

Topics: HD28 Management. Industrial Management, HB Economic Theory
Publisher: Aston-Birmingham PhD Colloquium 2008
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1995). A comparison of changes in the structure of wage in four countries”,
  2. (2003). A Test of the ‘Krugman Hypothesis’ for the United States,
  3. (1996). Changes in the Distribution of Wage and Unemployment in OECD Countries”.
  4. (1998). Globalisation and the Rise in Labour Market Inequalities”. doi
  5. (1993). How Computer Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence From Microdata”,
  6. (1995). How Trade Hurt Unskilled Workers”, doi
  7. (1996). International Differences in Male Wage Inequality: Institutions versus Market Forces”. doi
  8. (2007). Labour Market Institution and Wage Inequality”.
  9. (2004). Labour Market Institution and Wage Inequality”. IZA Discussion Paper No 1291. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.
  10. (1996). Labour Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wage: a semi-parametric approach”.
  11. (1994). North-South trade, employment, and inequality: Changing fortunes in a skill-driven world. doi
  12. (1994). Past and Prospective Causes of High Unemployment” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, fourth quarter,
  13. (2008). Racing away? Income inequality and the evolution of high incomes.” IFS Briefing Notes,
  14. (1986). Random Group Effects and the Precision of Regression Estimates.” doi
  15. (2007). Real Wage Cyclicality in Germany and the UK: New Results Using Panel Data”.
  16. (2004). Spikes and spill-overs: The impact of the national minimum wage on the wage distribution in a low-wage sector”. doi
  17. (2003). Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0 (Cross-Sectional Time-Series). College Station TX:
  18. (2007). Still Searching for the Wage Curve”,
  19. (2000). The Changing Distribution of Male Wages in the UK.”.
  20. (2001). The changing naturing of labour demand in the new economy and skilled-biased technology change”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, special issue, doi
  21. (1995). The changing Structure of Male Earnings in Britain,
  22. (1998). The Dynamics of Union Membership in Britain. A Study Using The Family and Working Lives Survey.”
  23. (1990). The effect of Union Membership on Occupational Pension Coverage in Britain: A Disaggregated Analysis”.
  24. (2001). The Effect of Unions on Wage Inequality in the U.S. doi
  25. (1999). The Effects of Minimum Wages on Employment: Theory and Evidence from doi
  26. (2004). The employment effects of the national minimum wage”. doi
  27. (2008). The Impact Of ICT On The Demand For Skilled Labour: doi
  28. (2007). The Spot Market Matters: Evidence on Implicit Contracts from Britain.” doi
  29. (1998). The union/non-union wage differential: An application of semi-parametric methods,” doi
  30. (1994). Trade and jobs in doi
  31. (1998). Trade union decline and the distribution of wages in the UK: evidence from kernel density estimation”. doi
  32. (2003). Unionization and Wage Inequality: a comparative study of the US, UK and Canada”,
  33. (1995). Using cointegration analysis in econometric modelling.
  34. (1996). Wage Inequality in the UK.” doi
  35. (1999). Wage Inequality in the United States During the 1980s: Rising Dispersion or Falling Minimum Wage?” doi
  36. (2000). Wage Inequality, Collective Bargaining, and Relative Employment from
  37. (1999). Wage-Setting Institutions and Pay Inequality in doi
  38. (1998). Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.