In this paper, we will sketch the basic system of Justification Logic, which is a general logical framework for reasoning about epistemic justification. Justification Logic renders a new, evidence-based foundation for epistemic logic. As a case study, we compare formalizations of the Kripke ‘Red Barn ’ scenario in modal epistemic logic and Justification Logic and show here that the latter provides a deeper analysis. In particular, we argue that modal language fails to fully represent the epistemic closure principle whereas Justification Logic provides its adequate formalization.
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.