Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Supporting Collaborative Operations within a Coalition Personnel Recovery Center

By G Wickler, Austin Tate and J Hansberger


The University of Edinburgh and research sponsors are authorised to reproduce and distribute reprints and on-line copies for their purposes notwithstanding any copyright annotation hereon. The views and conclusions contained herein are the author’s and shouldn’t be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of other parties.Abstract—I-X is a framework that can be used to create an application in which multiple agents adopt a task-centric view of a situation, and which supports the necessary coordination of their activities to respond to that situation. The I-X Process Panel\ud provides the functionality of a to-do list and instant messaging and thus, it is a useful tool when it comes to organizing the\ud response to an emergency. However, I-X goes well beyond this metaphor and provides a number of useful extensions that facilitate the finding and adaptation of plans for teams to respond in dynamic situations.\ud \ud In the Co-OPR (Collaborative Operations for Personnel Recovery) project, the I-X framework has been used to support\ud training exercises for personnel recovery. This paper will describe some of the initial findings that are the result of experiments conducted to evaluate the suitability and extent to which personnel recovery trainees and trainers can be supported by I-X in so-called “Command Post Exercises”. The result shows that an I-X application can be useful in such a scenario by eliminating some of the basic problems that often occur

Topics: Informatics, Computer Science, personnel recovery, collaboration, decision-making, emergency response, search and rescue, Artificial Intelligence Applications Institute
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). An Ontology for Mixed-initiative Synthesis Tasks.
  2. (2001). Compendium: Making Meetings into Knowledge Events. Knowledge Technologies
  3. (1991). Design space analysis: Bridging from theory to practice via design rationale.
  4. (2003). Dialog Mapping: Reflections on an Industrial Strength Case Study. doi
  5. (1981). Force Management Decision Requirements for Air Force Tactical Command and Control. doi
  6. (2006). Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale: 15 Years on from gIBIS and QOC. In: doi
  7. (2002). I-P2- Intelligent Process Panels to Support Coalition Operations.
  8. (1995). Integrating Constraint Management into an AI Planner. doi
  9. (2005). Joint Doctrine for Personnel Recovery, 2nd Draft,
  10. (1998). Rationale in Planning: Causality, Dependencies and Decisions. doi
  11. (2006). Science Strategy and War, The Strategic Theory of doi
  12. (1993). Sharing To-Do Lists with a Distributed Task Manager. In: doi
  13. (1999). SHOP: A Simple Hierarchical Ordered Planner.
  14. (1999). Supporting Collaborative Analysis and Design with Hypertext Functionality,
  15. (2006). The Soft Real-Time Agent Control Architecture. doi
  16. (2006). Using the Constraint Model as a Shared Representation of Intentions for Emergency Response,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.