Data from a national survey of 104 self-help groups for former mental patients were examined to assess actual and potential part-nerships between these groups and mental health professionals. The groups ’ level of interaction with andattitudes toward professionals varied with the structure, affiia-tion, and service model of the groups. The majority were mod-er-ate “supportive ” groups in which partnerships with professionals could occur but were problematic. Less common were radical “sep-aratist”groups, with which profes-sional partnerships were almost guaranteed to fail, and conserva-tive “partnership ” groups, with which partnerships were likely to succeed. Strong antipsychiatric at-titudes throughout the mental patient movement suggest that mental health professionals who approach former-patient groups with narrow clinical conceptions of mental illness are likely to fail in establishing partnerships. The growing partnership between self-help groups and the formal health care delivery system, recog-nized by health leaders such as former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop (1), suggests the importance of a broad, comparative understanding of the different types of self-help groups. Although self-help groups have been the subject ofmuch stud
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.