‘From Page to Screen: The Visual and Emotional Legacy of the Holocaust in Schindler’s Ark and Schindler’s List’

Thomas Keneally is an acclaimed Australian author most famous for ‘Schindler’s Ark’ his novel that follow the life of Oskar Schindler and his efforts to save Jews during the Holocaust. The book won the Booker Prize in 1982 and was later adapted into Steven Spielberg\u27s, an American filmmaker and producer, Schindler\u27s List. Spielberg’s groundbreaking storytelling and technical innovation is an essential example of visual culture in a fil adaptation. This article examines Stephen Spielberg’s 1994 film Schindler’s List, an adaptation of Thomas Keneally’s 1982 novel Schindler’s Ark, and analyses how both works utilize visual and auditory elements to evoke the trauma of the Holocaust. Ultimately, both the novel and film underscore the importance of remembrance, using visual and auditory techniques to emphasize the collective responsibility to prevent future atrocities

Exploring the uses of a journalist narrator and manufactured conflict in Hustlers, the on-screen adaptation of Jessica Pressler’s ‘The Hustlers at Scores’ article.

Jessica Pressler, journalist for New York magazine, bears the unique distinction of inspiring two on-screen adaptations of her journalistic process in producing two separate articles. \u27The Hustlers at Scores\u27 (2015) article was recovered from the New York magazine\u27s archives and transcribed into a major Hollywood film, written and directed by Lorene Scafaria. Hustlers (2019) was released into the full bloom of the #MeToo movement, where it slotted neatly into the happening conversations on female narratives and whistle-blowers. The film surprised Jessica Pressler and viewers alike with its inclusion of a journalist character and the research process behind her article. Sandwiched between the scenes of glittering revelry, strip clubs, and mayhem, Hustler\u27s journalist character, Elizabeth, can feel somewhat irritatingly misplaced. This article explores Elizabeth\u27s underappreciated value as an open door through which audiences can welcome the story of the Pressler article, lending particular focus to the film\u27s class and social analyses, the political context in which the film was released, and used of manufactured conflict as a narrational device.

Editor\u27s Letter

A letter from the edito

The Gothic Legacy of Dracula

Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1897) and Francis Ford Coppola’s 1992 film adaptation showcase the timeless appeal of Gothic storytelling. The novel explores Victorian anxieties, including fears of foreign invasion, societal changes, and the consequences of desire. Lucy Westenra’s transformation into a vampire reflects these fears, symbolizing the dangers of unrestrained female autonomy, while Mina Murray embodies the ideal Victorian woman, balancing intelligence, loyalty, and morality. Coppola’s film adapts these themes for a modern audience, reimagining Dracula as a tragic figure driven by love and loss, adding emotional depth to his character. The Gothic elements, such as the eerie Castle Dracula, fear of the unknown, and fragmented narratives, connect both versions, though Coppola uses powerful visuals, colors, and symbolism to enhance the Gothic atmosphere. The differences between the two works highlight their reflection of societal concerns, with Stoker’s Dracula representing external threats and Coppola’s version focusing on inner struggles. Together, the novel and film reveal why Dracula remains a captivating and enduring story across generations

How does the 2020 TV adaptation of Sally Rooney\u27s Normal People captivate the highly emotive landscape using aspects of visual culture?

This critical response will evaluate the transition between Rooney\u27s 2018 coming-of age novel; and the 2020 TV drama which accurately depicts an authentic portrayal of her original story. I will be examining aspects of visual culture which help bring the book to life, touching on a range of social themes which become the driving force throughout the novella.

How does interplay between John Webster\u27s \u27Duchess of Malfi \u27script and Sam Wanamaker\u27s candle lit play influence visual culture and the audience perspective?

This critical essay will explore how visual culture interplays between John Webster’s “Duchess of Malfi” and Sam Wanamaker’s candle lit play effect the audience’s perspective. While we read Websters language that delves into themes of corruption, power, and mortality the dimly lit stage Is able to bring it to life and intensifying them. By examining the way different lighting, it can interpret many things making the audience see or feel different things. This essay argues that the visual elements of Wanamaker’s do more than simply compliment Websters play but is able to heighten the psychological and emotional impact of the play, making ‘The Duchess Of Malfi’ on stage a more immersive experience

Between Words and Images: The Complex Dynamics of Love in Normal People

This article examines Sally Rooney\u27s \u27Normal People\u27 in both its novel and television adaptation forms, highlighting the complexities of human relationships and the interplay of class, identity, and emotional connection. It focuses on how the narrative explores themes of communication and miscommunication, illustrated through key scenes such as Connell\u27s hesitation to invite Marianne to the school dance, which reflects societal pressures. The television adaptation\u27s visual storytelling enhances this exploration, particularly in the intimate moments shared between the characters, where the camera captures their emotional nuances. This analysis showcases how "Normal People" engages with literature and visual culture, inviting deeper empathy and connection from its audience

Contents and Acknowledgements

Contents and Acknowledgement

Eternal Youth and its Consequences: How Film Adaptations of Dorian Gray Portray Moral Decline

In The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891), Oscar Wilde explores the dark consequences of vanity, beauty and moral decay. Through the lens of a young man\u27s obsession with eternal youth, Wilde reveals a chilling portrait of a society that values appearance above all else, and where the price of such obsession is a corrupted soul. The novel\u27s haunting imagery of Dorian\u27s portrait - a reflection of his hidden depravity - has captivated readers for over a century, resonating far beyond its original pages. This powerful symbolism has been vividly brought to life in several adaptations, including Albert Lewin\u27s 1945 version and Oliver Parker\u27s 2009 retelling. Both films intensify Wilde\u27s themes and offer unique interpretations of Dorian\u27s moral collapse. Together, they reimagine the novel\u27s cautionary tale, reminding us that the pursuit of beauty, when divorced from morality, can lead to a fate far more monstrous than we could ever imagine

From the Renaissance to the modern world: comparison of William Shakespeare\u27s Romeo and Juliet and Baz Luhrmann\u27s 1996 film adaptation

William Shakespeare is regarded as one of the most influential playwrights and writers. Even though his work dates to the Renaissance, specifically the 16th century, it still resonates with us today. One of his seminal works is Romeo and Juliet, a tragic tale of two lovers sealed by feuding families. Set in Verona, Italy, the story has won millions of fans and inspired many artists to adapt it for film, theatre, and books. In the adaptations, the main point of the story remains the same, but the themes and execution differ significantly, especially visually. Personally, I was most interested in the 1996 film adaptation. This adaptation was directed by Baz Luhrmann, who cast Leonardo DiCaprio (Romeo) and Claire Danes (Juliet) in the lead roles. But how does Baz Luhrmann’s work specifically differ from Shakespeare\u27s story?