167 research outputs found

    Evaluation of the reported data linkage process and associated quality issues for linked routinely collected healthcare data in multimorbidity research: a systematic methodology review

    Get PDF
    Objective The objective of this systematic review was to examine how the record linkage process is reported in multimorbidity research. Methods A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Web of Science and Embase using predefined search terms, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Published studies from 2010 to 2020 using linked routinely collected data for multimorbidity research were included. Information was extracted on how the linkage process was reported, which conditions were studied together, which data sources were used, as well as challenges encountered during the linkage process or with the linked dataset. Results Twenty studies were included. Fourteen studies received the linked dataset from a trusted third party. Eight studies reported variables used for the data linkage, while only two studies reported conducting prelinkage checks. The quality of the linkage was only reported by three studies, where two reported linkage rate and one raw linkage figures. Only one study checked for bias by comparing patient characteristics of linked and non-linked records. Conclusions The linkage process was poorly reported in multimorbidity research, even though this might introduce bias and potentially lead to inaccurate inferences drawn from the results. There is therefore a need for increased awareness of linkage bias and transparency of the linkage processes, which could be achieved through better adherence to reporting guidelines. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021243188

    Desensitisation to cigarette package graphic health warnings:a cohort comparison between London and Singapore

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: We compared 2 sociocultural cohorts with different duration of exposure to graphic health warning labels (GHWL), to investigate a possible desensitisation to their use. We further studied how a differing awareness and emotional impact of smoking-associated risks could be used to prevent this. SETTING: Structured interviews of patients from the general respiratory department were undertaken between 2012 and 2013 in 2 tertiary hospitals in Singapore and London. PARTICIPANTS: 266 participants were studied, 163 Londoners (35% smokers, 54% male, age 52±18 years) and 103 Singaporeans (53% smokers, p=0.003; 78% male, p<0.001; age 58±15 years, p=0.012). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: 50 items assessed demographics, smoking history, knowledge and the deterring impact of smoking-associated risks. After showing 10 GHWL, the impact on emotional response, cognitive processing and intended smoking behaviour was recorded. RESULTS: Singaporeans scored lower than the Londoners across all label processing constructs, and this was consistent for the smoking and non-smoking groups. Londoners experienced more ‘disgust’ and felt GHWL were more effective at preventing initiation of, or quitting, smoking. Singaporeans had a lower awareness of lung cancer (82% vs 96%, p<0.001), despite ranking it as the most deterring consequence of smoking. Overall, ‘blindness’ was the least known potential risk (28%), despite being ranked as more deterring than ‘stroke’ and ‘oral cancer’ in all participants. CONCLUSIONS: The length of exposure to GHWL impacts on the effectiveness. However, acknowledging the different levels of awareness and emotional impact of smoking-associated risks within different sociocultural cohorts could be used to maintain their impact

    Exercise rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge for recovery from critical illness:executive summary of a Cochrane Collaboration systematic review

    Get PDF
    Skeletal muscle wasting and weakness are major complications of critical illness and underlie the profound physical and func-\ud tional impairments experienced by survivors after discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). Exercise-based rehabilitation\ud has been shown to be bene\ud fi\ud cial when delivered during ICU admission. This review aimed to determine the effectiveness of\ud exercise rehabilitation initiated after ICU discharge on primary outcomes of functional exercise capacity and health-related\ud quality of life. We sought randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials, and controlled clinical trials compar-\ud ing an exercise intervention commenced after ICU discharge vs. any other intervention or a control or\ud ‘\ud usual care\ud ’\ud programme\ud in adult survivors of critical illness. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval Sys-\ud tem Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases\ud were searched up to February 2015. Dual, independent screening of results, data extraction, and quality appraisal were per-\ud formed. We included six trials involving 483 patients. Overall quality of evidence for both outcomes was very low. All studies\ud evaluated functional exercise capacity, with three reporting positive effects in favour of the intervention. Only two studies\ud evaluated health-related quality of life and neither reported differences between intervention and control groups. Meta-\ud analyses of data were precluded due to variation in study design, types of interventions, and selection and reporting of out-\ud come measurements. We were unable to determine an overall effect on functional exercise capacity or health-related quality\ud of life of interventions initiated after ICU discharge for survivors of critical illness. Findings from ongoing studies are awaited.\ud Future studies need to address methodological aspects of study design and conduct to enhance rigour, quality, and synthesis

    Development and validation of a casemix classification to predict costs of specialist palliative care provision across inpatient hospice, hospital and community settings in the UK: a study protocol

    Get PDF
    Introduction Provision of palliative care is inequitable with wide variations across conditions and settings in the UK. Lack of a standard way to classify by case complexity is one of the principle obstacles to addressing this. We aim to develop and validate a casemix classification to support the prediction of costs of specialist palliative care provision.Methods and analysis Phase I: A cohort study to determine the variables and potential classes to be included in a casemix classification. Data are collected from clinicians in palliative care services across inpatient hospice, hospital and community settings on: patient demographics, potential complexity/casemix criteria and patient-level resource use. Cost predictors are derived using multivariate regression and then incorporated into a classification using classification and regression trees. Internal validation will be conducted by bootstrapping to quantify any optimism in the predictive performance (calibration and discrimination) of the developed classification. Phase II: A mixed-methods cohort study across settings for external validation of the classification developed in phase I. Patient and family caregiver data will be collected longitudinally on demographics, potential complexity/casemix criteria and patient-level resource use. This will be triangulated with data collected from clinicians on potential complexity/casemix criteria and patient-level resource use, and with qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers about care provision across difference settings. The classification will be refined on the basis of its performance in the validation data set.Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the National Health Service Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee. The results are expected to be disseminated in 2018 through papers for publication in major palliative care journals; policy briefs for clinicians, commissioning leads and policy makers; and lay summaries for patients and public

    The impact of outpatient <i>versus</i> inpatient management on health-related quality of life outcomes for patients with malignant pleural effusion: the OPTIMUM randomised clinical trial

    Get PDF
    Background: The principal aim of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) management is to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptoms.Methods: In this open-label randomised controlled trial, patients with symptomatic MPE were randomly assigned to either indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) insertion with the option of talc pleurodesis or chest drain and talc pleurodesis. The primary end-point was global health status, measured with the 30-item European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at 30 days post-intervention. 142 participants were enrolled from July 2015 to December 2019.Results: Of participants randomly assigned to the IPC (n=70) and chest drain (n=72) groups, primary outcome data were available in 58 and 56 patients, respectively. Global health status improved in both groups at day 30 compared with baseline: IPC (mean difference 13.11; p=0.001) and chest drain (mean difference 10.11; p=0.001). However, there was no significant between-group difference at day 30 (mean intergroup difference in baseline-adjusted global health status 2.06, 95% CI −5.86–9.99; p=0.61), day 60 or day 90. No significant differences were identified between groups in breathlessness and chest pain scores. All chest drain arm patients were admitted (median length of stay 4 days); seven patients in the IPC arm required intervention-related hospitalisation.Conclusions: While HRQoL significantly improved in both groups, there were no differences in patient-reported global health status at 30 days. The outpatient pathway using an IPC was not superior to inpatient treatment with a chest drain

    TEACHERS VIEWS OF THE NEW EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT - THE ONE-COMPUTER CLASSROOM

    Get PDF
    Glavni je cilj provedenih istraĆŸivanja, empirijskog neeksperimentalnog u listopadu 2006. g., i kvalitativnog, provedenog metodom Delphi u travnju 2008. g., ispitivanje glediĆĄta učitelja primarnog obrazovanja o uporabi jednog računala u razredu i o novoj obrazovnoj sredini Ñ učionici s jednim računalom. U rezultatima kvantitativnog istraĆŸivanja statistički je značajna na razini 1% varijabla posjedovanje računala u razredu, ĆĄto znači da učitelji koji imaju računalo u razredu imaju pozitivnije glediĆĄte o njegovoj uporabi. Rezultati kvalitativnog istraĆŸivanja upozoravaju na potrebu prilagodbe obrazovnog sustava promijenjenom načinu ĆŸivljenja. Tradicionalni ĆĄkolski sustav nuĆŸno je transformirati u sustav novoga digitalnog doba, obiljeĆŸenog inovacijama te nizom postupaka pretvorbe i redefinicije nastavnih programa koji su konzistentni s novim tehnologijama i pratećom multimedijom.The main goal of the empirical, non-experimental study conducted in October 2006, and of the qualitative study conducted by using the Delphi method in April 2008, was to examine the views of elementary-school teachers on the use of one computer in the classroom and on the new educational environment - the one-computer classroom. The results of the quantitative study show that the variable of having a computer in the classroom is statistically significant at the level of 1%, which means that teachers who have a computer in the classroom have a more positive view on its use. The results of the qualitative study indicate that there is a need to adjust the education system to a changed way of life. The traditional school system must be transformed into a new digital age system, marked by innovations and a number of processes of transforming and redefining teaching programmes to make them consistent with the new technologies and accompanying multimedia
    • 

    corecore