7 research outputs found

    Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

    Get PDF
    Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

    THE INFLUENCE OF DYSLIPIDEMIA ON THE PERIODONTAL STATUS IN TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS

    No full text
    Introduction Diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia are independent risk factors for the periodontal disease; patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus frequently present an impaired lipid profile. Aim of the study We proposed an evaluation of the periodontal status in type 2 diabetic patients, with and without dyslipidemia. Material and methods The study was conducted on 43 patients, divided in two groups: study group (patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia) and the control group (patients with diabetes but without hyperlipidemia). The lipid profile was assessed and every patient was submitted to periodontal clinical examination. Results The study group presented significantly higher values of the periodontal parameters (probing depth, clinical attachment loss, bleeding on probing) than the control group. Discussions Patients with dyslipidemia (already in high risk of periodontal disease due to the presence of diabetes mellitus) can present a significant risk to periodontal tissue breakdown. There is also to be mentioned that a vicious circle becomes existent, the periodontal disease itself enhancing the systemic inflammatory status and predisposing to a poor glycaemic control. Conclusions The patients with diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia exerted higher values of the parameters relevant for the periodontal inflammation and tissue loss than the patients without dyslipidemia

    Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study (Intensive Care Medicine, (2021), 47, 2, (160-169), 10.1007/s00134-020-06234-9)

    No full text
    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The members of the ESICM Trials Group Collaborators were not shown in the article but only in the ESM. The full list of collaborators is shown below. The original article has been corrected
    corecore