6 research outputs found
Outcome in patients perceived as receiving excessive care across different ethical climates: a prospective study in 68 intensive care units in Europe and the USA
Purpose: Whether the quality of the ethical climate in the intensive care unit (ICU) improves the identification of patients receiving excessive care and affects patient outcomes is unknown. Methods: In this prospective observational study, perceptions of excessive care (PECs) by clinicians working in 68 ICUs in Europe and the USA were collected daily during a 28-day period. The quality of the ethical climate in the ICUs was assessed via a validated questionnaire. We compared the combined endpoint (death, not at home or poor quality of life at 1 year) of patients with PECs and the time from PECs until written treatment-limitation decisions (TLDs) and death across the four climates defined via cluster analysis. Results: Of the 4747 eligible clinicians, 2992 (63%) evaluated the ethical climate in their ICU. Of the 321 and 623 patients not admitted for monitoring only in ICUs with a good (n = 12, 18%) and poor (n = 24, 35%) climate, 36 (11%) and 74 (12%), respectively were identified with PECs by at least two clinicians. Of the 35 and 71 identified patients with an available combined endpoint, 100% (95% CI 90.0–1.00) and 85.9% (75.4–92.0) (P = 0.02) attained that endpoint. The risk of death (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.20–2.92) or receiving a written TLD (HR 2.32, CI 1.11–4.85) in patients with PECs by at least two clinicians was higher in ICUs with a good climate than in those with a poor one. The differences between ICUs with an average climate, with (n = 12, 18%) or without (n = 20, 29%) nursing involvement at the end of life, and ICUs with a poor climate were less obvious but still in favour of the former. Conclusion: Enhancing the quality of the ethical climate in the ICU may improve both the identification of patients receiving excessive care and the decision-making process at the end of life
V-E/V-CO2 is slope is associated with abnormal resting haemodynamics and a predictor of long-term survival in chronic heart failure
Background: Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) present with
exercise-induced hyperpnea, but its pathophysiological mechanism has not
been thoroughly investigated. We aimed to determine the relationship
between exercise-induced hyperpnea, resting haemodynamic measurements
and the validity of ventilatory response (V-E/V-CO2 slope) as a
mortality predictor in CHF patients.
Methods: Ninety-eight CHF patients (90M/8F) underwent a symptom-limited
treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Right heart
catheterization and radionuclide ventriculography were performed within
72 h of CPET.
Results: Twenty-seven patients died from cardiac causes during 20 +/- 6
months follow-up. Non-survivors ‘ had a lower peak oxygen consumption
(V(O2)p), (16.5 +/- 4.9vs. 20.2 +/- 6,1, ml/kg/min,p=0.003), a steeper
V-E/V-CO2 slope (34.8 +/- 8.3 vs. 28.9 +/- 4.8, p < 0.001) and a higher
pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (19.5 +/- 8.6 vs. 11.7 +/- 6.5
min Hg, p=0.008) than survivors. By multivariate survival analysis, the
V-E/V-CO2 slope as a continuous variable was an independent prognostic
factor (chi(2) : 8.5, relative risk: 1. 1, 95% CI: 1.03 -1.18, p =
0.004). Overall mortality was 52% in patients with V-E/V-CO2 slope >=
34 and 18% in those with V-E/V-CO2 slope < 34 (log rank: 18.5, p <
0.001). In a subgroup of patients (V(O2)p: 10-18 ml/kg/min), V-E/V-CO2
slope was a significant predictor of mortality (relative risk: 6.2, 95%
CI: 1.7-22.2, p=0.002). Patients with high V-E/V-CO2 slope had higher
resting PCWP (19.9 +/- 9.1 vs. 11.3 +/- 5.7 mmHg, p < 0.001) and
V-E/V-CO2 slope correlated significantly with PCWP (r: 0.57, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The V-E/V-CO2 slope, as an index of ventilatory response to
exercise, improves the fisk stratification of CHF patients. Interstitial
pulmonary oedema may be a pathophysiological mechanism of inefficient
ventilation during exercise in these patients. (c) 2005 European Society
of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved