White Matter Integrity and Processing Speed in Sickle Cell Anemia

Objective The purpose of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to investigate whether changes in white matter integrity are related to slower processing speed in sickle cell anemia. Methods Thirty-seven patients with silent cerebral infarction, 46 patients with normal MRI, and 32 sibling controls (age range 8–37 years) underwent cognitive assessment using the Wechsler scales and 3-tesla MRI. Tract-based spatial statistics analyses of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) parameters were performed. Results Processing speed index (PSI) was lower in patients than controls by 9.34 points (95% confi- dence interval: 4.635–14.855, p = 0.0003). Full Scale IQ was lower by 4.14 scaled points (95% confidence interval: −1.066 to 9.551, p = 0.1), but this difference was abolished when PSI was included as a covariate (p = 0.18). There were no differences in cognition between patients with and without silent cerebral infarction, and both groups had lower PSI than controls (both p < 0.001). In patients, arterial oxygen content, socioeconomic status, age, and male sex were identified as predictors of PSI, and correlations were found between PSI and DTI scalars (fractional anisotropy r = 0.614, p < 0.00001; r = −0.457, p < 0.00001; mean diffusivity r = −0.341, p = 0.0016; radial diffusivity r = −0.457, p < 0.00001) and NODDI parameters (intracellular volume fraction r = 0.364, p = 0.0007) in widespread regions. Conclusion Our results extend previous reports of impairment that is independent of presence of infarction and may worsen with age. We identify processing speed as a vulnerable domain, with deficits potentially mediating difficulties across other domains, and provide evidence that reduced processing speed is related to the integrity of normal-appearing white matter using microstructure parameters from DTI and NODDI

Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this report is to provide a succinct but comprehensive summary of the scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of manual treatment for the management of a variety of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The conclusions are based on the results of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), widely accepted and primarily UK and United States evidence-based clinical guidelines, plus the results of all RCTs not yet included in the first three categories. The strength/quality of the evidence regarding effectiveness was based on an adapted version of the grading system developed by the US Preventive Services Task Force and a study risk of bias assessment tool for the recent RCTs.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>By September 2009, 26 categories of conditions were located containing RCT evidence for the use of manual therapy: 13 musculoskeletal conditions, four types of chronic headache and nine non-musculoskeletal conditions. We identified 49 recent relevant systematic reviews and 16 evidence-based clinical guidelines plus an additional 46 RCTs not yet included in systematic reviews and guidelines.</p> <p>Additionally, brief references are made to other effective non-pharmacological, non-invasive physical treatments.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Spinal manipulation/mobilization is effective in adults for: acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain; migraine and cervicogenic headache; cervicogenic dizziness; manipulation/mobilization is effective for several extremity joint conditions; and thoracic manipulation/mobilization is effective for acute/subacute neck pain. The evidence is inconclusive for cervical manipulation/mobilization alone for neck pain of any duration, and for manipulation/mobilization for mid back pain, sciatica, tension-type headache, coccydynia, temporomandibular joint disorders, fibromyalgia, premenstrual syndrome, and pneumonia in older adults. Spinal manipulation is not effective for asthma and dysmenorrhea when compared to sham manipulation, or for Stage 1 hypertension when added to an antihypertensive diet. In children, the evidence is inconclusive regarding the effectiveness for otitis media and enuresis, and it is not effective for infantile colic and asthma when compared to sham manipulation.</p> <p>Massage is effective in adults for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain. The evidence is inconclusive for knee osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, myofascial pain syndrome, migraine headache, and premenstrual syndrome. In children, the evidence is inconclusive for asthma and infantile colic.</p

In Vitro Activation of Cytochrome P450 46A1 (CYP46A1) by Efavirenz-Related Compounds

Cytochrome P450 46A1 (CYP46A1) is a central nervous system-specific enzyme, which catalyzes cholesterol 24-hydroxylation. Currently CYP46A1 is being evaluated in a clinical trial for activation by small doses of the anti-HIV drug efavirenz. Eight efavirenz-related compounds were investigated for CYP46A1 activation in vitro, induction of a CYP46A1 spectral response, spectral Kd values, interaction with the P450 allosteric sites, and a model of binding to the enzyme active site. We gained insight into structure-activity relationships of efavirenz for CYP46A1 activation and found that the investigated efavirenz primary metabolites are stronger and better activators of CYP46A1 than efavirenz. We also established that CYP46A1 is activated by racemates and that a conformational-selection mechanism is operative in CYP46A1. The results suggest structural modifications of efavirenz to further increase CYP46A1 activation without inhibition at high compound concentrations. It is possible that not only efavirenz but its metabolites activate CYP46A1 in vivo.status: publishe