Специфіка гуманізму епохи Відродження

Objectives. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels predict prognosis and outcome in heart failure (HF) patients. To evaluate the optimal cut-off level of BNP to predict death, need for hospitalization, and worsening HF, and also to determine the optimal time to apply the chosen cut-off value. Design. In a sub-study from the Use of PeptideS in Tailoring hEart failure Project or UPSTEP study where tailoring treatment of HF by BNP level was evaluated, we assessed the change in percentage between levels of BNP at study start versus a specific week (2, 6, 10, 16, 24, 36, or 48) during the follow-up period. Results. The optimum cut-off percentage levels were obtained using a Cox proportional regression analysis of death, hospitalization, and worsening HF. A decrease in BNP by less than 40% in week 16 compared with study start and/or a BNP > 300 ng/L presented the highest hazard ratio (HR) for a non-responder to reach a combined endpoint (HR: 2.43; 95% confidence interval or CI: 1.61-3.65; p < 0.00003). This definition gave a 78% risk reduction of cardiovascular (CV) mortality (p > 0.0005) and an 89% risk reduction of HF mortality (p > 0.004), and reduced risk of CV and HF hospitalization for the responders. Conclusions. Patients with a decrease in BNP of more than 40% compared with that at study start and/or a BNP level below 300 ng/L at week 16 had a significantly reduced risk of CV and HF mortality and hospitalization

Метод связных пар в теории решения задач и новые инструменты его реализации

Aim To determine whether brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)-guided heart failure (HF) treatment improves morbidity and/or mortality when compared with conventional treatment. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanMethods and results UPSTEP was an investigator-initiated, randomized, parallel group, multicentre study with a PROBE design. Symptomatic patients with worsening HF, New York Heart Association class II-IV, ejection fraction andlt;40% and elevated BNP levels, were included. All patients (n = 279) were treated according to recommended guidelines and randomized to BNP-guided (BNP) or to conventional (CTR) HF treatment. The goal was to reduce BNP levels to andlt;150 ng/L in younger patients and andlt;300 ng/L in elderly patients, respectively. The primary outcome was a composite of death due to any cause, need for hospitalization and worsening HF. The study groups were well matched, including for BNP concentration at entry (mean: 808 vs. 899 ng/L; P = 0.34). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding either the primary outcome (P = 0.18) or any of the secondary endpoints. There were no differences for the pre-specified analyses; days out of hospital, and younger vs. elderly. A subgroup analysis comparing treatment responders (andgt;30% decrease in baseline BNP value) vs. non-responders found improved survival among responders (P andlt; 0.0001 for the primary outcome), and all of the secondary endpoints were also improved. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanConclusions Morbidity and mortality were not improved by HF treatment guided by BNP levels. However, BNP responders had a significantly better clinical outcome than non-responders. Future research is needed to elucidate the responsible pathophysiological mechanisms in this sub-population.Funding Agencies|Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation||Regional Research Foundation in South-eastern Sweden||Regional Research Foundation in Northern Sweden||Biosite International||Infiniti Medical AB||</p

Persistent High Burden of Heart Failure Across the Ejection Fraction Spectrum in a Nationwide Setting

Background Heart failure (HF) has a dramatic impact on worldwide health care systems that is determined by the growing prevalence of and the high exposure to cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events. Prognosis remains poor. We sought to compare a large population with HF across the ejection fraction (EF) spectrum with a population without HF for patient characteristics, and HF, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular outcomes. Methods and Results Patients with HF registered in the Swedish HF registry in 2005 to 2018 were compared 1:3 with a sex-, age-, and county-matched population without HF. Outcomes were cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality and hospitalizations. Of 76 453 patients with HF, 53% had reduced EF, 23% mildly reduced EF, and 24% preserved EF. Compared with those without HF, patients with HF had more cardiovascular and noncardiovascular comorbidities and worse socioeconomic status. Incidence of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events was higher in people with HF versus non-HF, with increased risk of all-cause (hazard ratio [HR], 2.53 [95% CI, 2.50-2.56]), cardiovascular (HR, 4.67 [95% CI, 4.59-4.76]), and noncardiovascular (HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.46-1.52]) mortality, 2- to 5-fold higher risk of first/repeated cardiovascular and noncardiovascular hospitalizations, and ~4 times longer in-hospital length of stay for any cause. Patients with HF with reduced EF had higher risk of HF hospitalizations, whereas those with HF with preserved EF had higher risk of all-cause and noncardiovascular hospitalization and mortality. Conclusions Patients with HF exert a high health care burden, with a much higher risk of cardiovascular, all-cause, and noncardiovascular events, and nearly 4 times as many days spent in hospital compared with those without HF. These epidemiological data may enable strategies for optimal resource allocation and HF trial design

Does Heterogeneity Exist in Treatment Associations With Renin–Angiotensin–System Inhibitors or Beta-blockers According to Phenotype Clusters in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction?

BACKGROUND: We explored the association between use of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors and beta-blockers, with mortality/morbidity in 5 previously identified clusters of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 20,980 patients with HFpEF from the Swedish HF registry, phenotyped into young–low comorbidity burden (12%), atrial fibrillation–hypertensive (32%), older–atrial fibrillation (24%), obese–diabetic (15%), and a cardiorenal cluster (17%). In Cox proportional hazard models with inverse probability weighting, there was no heterogeneity in the association between renin–angiotensin system inhibitor use and cluster membership for any of the outcomes: cardiovascular (CV) mortality, all-cause mortality, HF hospitalisation, CV hospitalisation, or non-CV hospitalisation. In contrast, we found a statistical interaction between beta-blocker use and cluster membership for all-cause mortality (P = .03) and non-CV hospitalisation (P = .001). In the young–low comorbidity burden and atrial fibrillation–hypertensive cluster, beta-blocker use was associated with statistically significant lower all-cause mortality and non-CV hospitalisation and in the obese–diabetic cluster beta-blocker use was only associated with a statistically significant lower non-CV hospitalisation. The interaction between beta-blocker use and cluster membership for all-cause mortality could potentially be driven by patients with improved EF. However, patient numbers were diminished when excluding those with improved EF and the direction of the associations remained similar. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFpEF, the association with all-cause mortality and non-CV hospitalisation was heterogeneous across clusters for beta-blockers. It remains to be elucidated how heterogeneity in HFpEF could influence personalized medicine and future clinical trial design

Outsourcing ethical dilemmas: regulating international surrogacy arrangements

This article argues that the English legislative regime is ineffective in regulating international surrogacy, particularly with regard to commercial payments. It suggests that if English law views surrogacy as exploitative, we have a responsibility to protect women both in England and abroad, and the only way to do so effectively is to create a domestic system of regulation that caters adequately for the demand in this country. This requires a system of authorisation for surrogacy before it is undertaken; ex-post facto examinations of agreements completed in other jurisdictions, after the child is already living with the commissioning parents, cannot be seen as an acceptable compromise, as authorisation will inevitably be granted in the child's best interests.This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Oxford University Press via http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwv04

Eligibility for vericiguat in a real-world heart failure population according to trial, guideline and label criteria:Data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry

Aim: We investigated the eligibility for vericiguat in a real-world heart failure (HF) population based on trial, guideline and label criteria. Methods and results: From the Swedish HF registry, 23 573 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) enrolled between 2000 and 2018, with a HF duration ≥6 months, were considered. Eligibility for vericiguat was calculated based on criteria from (i) the Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction (VICTORIA) trial; (ii) European and American guidelines on HF; (iii) product labelling according to the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. Estimated eligibility for vericiguat in the trial, guidelines, and label scenarios was 21.4%, 47.4%, and 47.4%, respectively. Prior HF hospitalization within 6 months was the criterion limiting eligibility the most in all scenarios (met by 49.1% of the population). In the trial scenario, other criteria meaningfully limiting eligibility were elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels and nitrate use. In all scenarios, eligibility was higher among patients hospitalized for HF at baseline (44.3% vs. 21.4% [trial scenario] and 97.3% vs. 47.4% [guideline/label scenarios] for hospitalized vs. non-hospitalized patients). Overall, eligible patients were older, had more severe HF, more comorbidities, and consequently higher cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization rates compared with ineligible patients across all scenarios. Conclusion: In a large and contemporary real-world HFrEF cohort, we estimated that 21.4% of patients would be eligible for vericiguat according to the VICTORIA trial selection criteria, 47.4% based on guidelines and labelling. Eligibility for vericiguat translated into the selection of a population at high risk of morbidity/mortality.</p

Association between potassium level and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a cohort study from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry

AimsHyperkalaemia and hypokalaemia are common in heart failure and associated with worse outcomes. However, the optimal potassium range is unknown. We sought to determine the optimal range of potassium in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (5.0- mmol/L. Potassium 5.0- mmol/L were more common with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and heart failure of longer duration and greater severity. The potassium level associated with the lowest hazard risk for mortality at 30- days, 12 months, and maximal follow- up was 4.2- mmol/L, and there was a steep increase in risk with both higher and lower potassium levels. In adjusted strata analyses, lower potassium was independently associated with all- cause mortality at 12 months and maximal follow- up, while higher potassium levels only increased risk at 30- days.ConclusionIn this nationwide registry, the relationship between potassium and mortality was U- shaped, with an optimal potassium value of 4.2- mmol/L. After multivariable adjustment, hypokalaemia was associated with increased long- term mortality but hyperkalaemia was associated with increased short- term mortality.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162724/3/EJHF1757-sup-0001-APPS1.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162724/2/ejhf1757_am.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/162724/1/ejhf1757.pd

Eligibility for dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in a real-world heart failure population

Background: We investigated eligibility for dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in a real-world heart failure (HF) cohort based on selection criteria of DAPA-HF, DELIVER, and EMPEROR trials. Methods and Results: Selection criteria were applied to the Swedish HF registry out-patient population according to three scenarios: (i) a “trial scenario” applying all selection criteria; (ii) a “pragmatic scenario” applying the most clinically relevant criteria; (iii) a “label scenario” following the regulatory agencies labels. Of 49,317 patients, 55% had ejection fraction (EF)&lt;40% and were assessed for eligibility based on DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced, 45% had EF≥40% and were assessed based on EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER. Eligibility using trial, pragmatic and label scenarios was: 35%, 61% and 80% for DAPA-HF; 31%, 55% and 81% for EMPEROR-Reduced; 30%, 61% and 74% for DELIVER; 32%, 59% and 75% for EMPEROR-Preserved. Main selection criteria limiting eligibility were HF duration and NT-proBNP. Eligible patients had more severe HF, more comorbidities, higher use of HF treatments and higher mortality/morbidity. Conclusions: In a real-world HF setting, eligibility for SGLT2i was similar whether selection criteria from DAPA-HF or EMPEROR-Reduced were applied in HFrEF, or EMPEROR-Preserved or DELIVER in HFpEF. These data might help stakeholders assessing the consequences of future trial eligibility

Narcolepsy and adjuvanted pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccines – Multi-country assessment

Background: In 2010, a safety signal was detected for narcolepsy following vaccination with Pandemrix, an AS03-adjuvanted monovalent pandemic H1N1 influenza (pH1N1) vaccine. To further assess a possible association and inform policy on future use of adjuvants, we conducted a multi-country study of narcolepsy and adjuvanted pH1N1 vaccines. Methods: We used electronic health databases to conduct a dynamic retrospective cohort study to assess narcolepsy incidence rates (IR) before and during pH1N1 virus circulation, and after pH1N1 vaccination campaigns in Canada, Denmark, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Using a case-control study design, we evaluated the risk of narcolepsy following AS03- and MF59-adjuvanted pH1N1 vaccines in Argentina, Canada, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, and the Netherlands. In the Netherlands, we also conducted a case-coverage study in children born between 2004 and 2009. Results: No changes in narcolepsy IRs were observed in any periods in single study sites except Sweden and Taiwan; in Taiwan incidence increased after wild-type pH1N1 virus circulation and in Sweden (a previously identified signaling country), incidence increased after the start of pH1N1 vaccination. No association was observed for Arepanrix-AS03 or Focetria-MF59 adjuvanted pH1N1 vaccines and narcolepsy in children or adults in the case-control study nor for children born between 2004 and 2009 in the Netherlands case-coverage study for Pandemrix-AS03. Conclusions: Other than elevated narcolepsy IRs in the period after vaccination campaigns in Sweden, we did not find an association between AS03- or MF59-adjuvanted pH1N1 vaccines and narcolepsy in children or adults in the sites studied, although power to evaluate the AS03-adjuvanted Pandemrix brand vaccine was limited in our study