5 research outputs found

    Two‐year outcomes of minimally invasive XEN Gel Stent implantation in primary open‐angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma

    No full text
    PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of XENŸ Gel Stent implantation in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (XFG) regarding the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of IOP-lowering medications over 2 years. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational, single-centre study, patients with POAG or XFG underwent implantation of the XENŸ Gel Stent with or without combined phacoemulsification. Changes in mean IOP, mean number of IOP-lowering medications, number of postoperative interventions, complete or qualified surgical success rate (defined as IOP < 18 mmHg without or with IOP-lowering medication, respectively) and complete surgical failure rate (defined as the necessity of a glaucoma-related secondary surgical intervention or loss of light perception) were assessed 12 months (12M) and 24 months (24M) postoperatively. RESULTS: Seventy-nine eyes of 63 patients with open-angle glaucoma were included in the study (71% POAG, 29% XFG). Before surgery, mean IOP was 23.4 ± 7.9 mmHg. IOP was 14.6 ± 3.6 mmHg 12 months postoperatively (-31% from baseline, 95% CI -42% to -20%, n = 30, p < 0.001) and 14.8 ± 4.4 mmHg 24 months postoperatively (-29% from baseline, 95% CI -30% to -41%, n = 28, p < 0.001). Mean number of IOP-lowering medications was significantly reduced from 2.7 ± 1.1 before surgery to 1.0 ± 1.2 (-69%, 95% CI -89% to 46%, p < 0.001) 12 months after surgery and 1.0 ± 1.2 (-64%, 95% CI -91% to -36%, p < 0.001) at 24 months after surgery. Complete surgical success was achieved in 39% (12M) and 34% (24M) of patients and qualified success in 29% (12M) and 27% (24M). 13 (16%) eyes were classified as complete surgical failure. In 62% of the patients needling procedures had to be performed. CONCLUSION: The XENŸ Gel Stent is an efficacious minimal invasive glaucoma surgery for primary open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, resulting in significant reduction of IOP and a reduction in glaucoma medications from baseline in two-third of treated patients with 2-year follow-up. Frequent follow-up examinations were mandatory to identify early and late bleb failure and additional needling procedures were necessary to reestablish aqueous flow

    SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: data from an international prospective cohort study

    No full text
    Background: Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could support safer elective surgery. Vaccine numbers are limited so this study aimed to inform their prioritization by modelling. Methods: The primary outcome was the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one COVID-19-related death in 1 year. NNVs were based on postoperative SARS-CoV-2 rates and mortality in an international cohort study (surgical patients), and community SARS-CoV-2 incidence and case fatality data (general population). NNV estimates were stratified by age (18-49, 50-69, 70 or more years) and type of surgery. Best- and worst-case scenarios were used to describe uncertainty. Results: NNVs were more favourable in surgical patients than the general population. The most favourable NNVs were in patients aged 70 years or more needing cancer surgery (351; best case 196, worst case 816) or non-cancer surgery (733; best case 407, worst case 1664). Both exceeded the NNV in the general population (1840; best case 1196, worst case 3066). NNVs for surgical patients remained favourable at a range of SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates in sensitivity analysis modelling. Globally, prioritizing preoperative vaccination of patients needing elective surgery ahead of the general population could prevent an additional 58 687 (best case 115 007, worst case 20 177) COVID-19-related deaths in 1 year. Conclusion: As global roll out of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination proceeds, patients needing elective surgery should be prioritized ahead of the general population
    corecore