CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
Beliefs Predicting Peace, Beliefs Predicting War: Jewish Americans and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Authors
Althusser
American Jewish Committee
+73 more
Ayalon
Bar-On
Bar-On
Bar-On
Bar-Tal
Bar-Tal
Bar-Tal
Bar-Tal
Bar-Tal
Bar-Tal
Beinart
Beinart
Beinstock
Bekerman
Benhorin
Benvenisti
Bilali
Bourdieu
Bourdieu
Brown
Bruner
Caspit
Chomsky
Cohen
Cohen
Doron
Eidelson
Farrar
Fox
Geertz
Habib
Halperin
Halperin
Hammack
Hammack
Hammack
Hammack
Hartman
Kelman
Kelman
Kelman
Kelman
Lakoff
Landy
Lerner
Maoz
Maoz
Maoz
Maoz
Mearsheimer
Nadler
Noor
Oren
Rouhana
Sahdra
Salkin
Salomon
Shain
Shain
Shain
Shamir
Shamir
Sherif
Smeekes
Smooha
Tajfel
Tajfel
Verkuyten
Vollhardt
Wohl
Yuchtman-Yaar
Zembylas
Zogby
Publication date
1 January 2012
Publisher
'Wiley'
Doi
Abstract
Jewish Americans' opinions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict influence both the Israeli and the U.S. governments. Consequently, the Jewish American diaspora can act to promote or inhibit the peace process between Israelis and Palestinians. Several different sociopsychological beliefs have been postulated to lead individuals to support the perpetuation of conflict. Among these beliefs are a sense of collective victimhood, dehumanization and delegitimization of the other side, a zero-sum view on the conflict, and a monolithic narrative about the conflict. In this exploratory study we examined the role of these beliefs in predicting Jewish Americans' rejection or support of compromise solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. A survey study of 176 Jewish Americans shows that a monolithic view on the conflict, dehumanizing and delegitimizing of the other side, and a zero-sum view on the conflict played an important role in predicting opposition to compromise solutions for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Beliefs about collective victimhood did not predict support for compromise solutions. Findings are discussed in terms of the centrality of narrative misrecognition in preventing agreement to concessions toward the other side. © 2013 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1037%2Fe521512014-...
Last time updated on 03/08/2021
Sustaining member
eScholarship - University of California
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:escholarship.org:ark:/1303...
Last time updated on 25/12/2021
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1111%2Fasap.12023
Last time updated on 16/11/2020