Comparison of the renal clearances of inulin and radioactive labelled hypaque as measures of the glomerular filtration rate in man

Abstract

The standard method of estimating the rate of glomerular filtration (G.F.R.) in man has been by the renal clearance of inulin since it was demonstrated. that this plant polysaccharide is neither secreted nor reabsorbed by the renal tubules. The criteria which must be satisfied by a substance for its renal clearance to cive a valid measure of glomerular filtration rate have been discussed in detail by Smith (1951). Chemical methods for the determination of inulin in plasma and urine have been rather unsatisfactory (Smith 1951) and a variety of substances have been studied in an attempt to find a substitute for inulin. The endogenous creatinine clearance is widely used for clinical purposes but the creatinine/inulin clearance ratio exceeds unity in many human subjects indicating a variable deree of tubular secretion of creatinine (Smith 1 951 , Berlune et al 1 964) and this clearance is not a reliable measure of glomerular filtration in man.Recently a number of compounds labelled with radioisotopes have been studied and found to have clearances similar to'that of inulin. Allyl inulin labelled with ¹²⁵I has a clearance virtually identical to that of inulin in the dog (Concannon et al 1964) but is not readily available and is difficult to sterilise. Radioactive ⁵⁷Co-labelled cyanocobalamin gives a satisfactory measure of G.F.R. if only the free vitamin in the plasma is measured (Nelp et al 1964, Cutler and Glatte 1965). However, even after a large loading dose of unlabelled cyanocobalamin, plasma protein binding, of the labelled compound occurs and is variable in extent, nor is it easy to determine the proportion. of the labelled vitamin which is plasma bound in vivo (Skins and Sgherzi 1964, Donaldson and Doig unpublished observations). The most convenient inulin substitutes so far available are .the radiographic contrast media sodium diatrizoate ( Hypaque) and meglumin diatrizoate (Renografin) labelled with ¹³I or ¹²⁵I. In man Hypaque appears to fulfil many of Smith's criteria, it is not significantly bound to plasma proteins (Lasser et al 1962) nor does it readily penetrate red blood cells (Denneberg et al 1961), its renal excretion is complete and its extrarenal excretion negligible (Denneberg 1965). Hypac,ue and Renografin have been shown by various authors to have clearances very similar to the simultaneous inulin or thiosulphate clearance in man and the literature on these compounds has been well reviewed by Denneberg (1965). However some authors have not found the Hypaque and inulin or thiosulphate clearances to be identical (Bianchi and Zampieri 1961, Woodruff and Malvin 1560, Stokes et al 1 ;62, Denneberg 1565 and while some comparisons were carried out during continuous infusion of inulin and Hypaque (Burbank et al 1963), others were made on the basis of a single injection of Hypaque (Bianchi and Zampieri 1961). The latter are difficult to interpret physiologically; the difficulties inherent in all "single injection" clearances have been discussed by Smith (1951) and Robson et al (1949) .It has been variously suggested that Hypaque is neither reabsorbed nor secreted by the renal tubules in man (Burbank et al 1963), nor in the dog Woodruff and Malvin 1960), that it is reabsorbed in man (Bianchi and Zampieri 1961) and in dog (Stokes et al 1962) and that it is both secreted and reabsorbed in man (Denneberg 1965).Morris et al (1965) found that the clearance of ¹³¹I Renografin did not alter when the plasma level was raised by large doses of inactive Renografin, suggesting that this compound is not handled by the tubules. However they studied only two subjects in this way. Hypaque would be expected to behave in the renal tubules in the same way as Renografin as it is the diatrizoate ion which is estimated in both cases. However Denneberg (1965) found that the Hypaque /inulin clearance ratio fell, on average, after the administration of the tubular blocking agent probenecid and concluded that Hypaque is secreted and perhaps also reabsorbed by the renal tubules in man.Because of this confusion in the literature about tubular handling of Hypaque in man, the studies described in this paper were carried out in an attempt to resolve the Question of whether or not radioactive labelled Hypaque is handled by the renal tubules and to investigate its clearance as a measure of the rate of glomerular filtration in human subjects

    Similar works