CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
The community-based prevention of diabetes (ComPoD) study: A randomised, waiting list controlled trial of a voluntary sector-led diabetes prevention programme
Authors
A Dunkley
AG Tabák
+54 more
Ann Griffin
AV Rowlands
B Brown
B Paulweber
CE Frangakis
Charles Abraham
CJ Greaves
CJ Greaves
CJ Greaves
CL Gillies
CL Gillies
Colin J. Greaves
DB Sacks
Department of Health
DL Katz
E Barry
E Gemmill
Emma Solomon-Moore
EuroQol Group
IR White
J Lindström
J Shannon
J Tuomilehto
Jane R. Smith
Janice L. Thompson
K Jolly
KG Alberti
KH Lewis
L Penn
L Radloff
Lisa Price
M Hildebrand
M Jones
M Pascale
Matthew Jones
Michele S. Y. Biddle
Michele S.Y. Kok
MJ Davies
P Sedgwick
PH Evans
R Emsley
R Taylor
R Tennant
Rod S. Taylor
Rosy Armstrong
RS Bhopal
S Capewell
SA Jebb
Sarah Moorlock
SJ Pocock
The Counterweight Project Team
WC Knowler
WG John
XR Pan
Publication date
1 January 2019
Publisher
'Springer Science and Business Media LLC'
Doi
Abstract
© 2019 The Author(s). Objective: This two-site randomised trial compared the effectiveness of a voluntary sector-led, community-based diabetes prevention programme to a waiting-list control group at 6 months, and included an observational follow-up of the intervention arm to 12 months. Methods: Adults aged 18-75 years at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes due to elevated blood glucose and being overweight were recruited from primary care practices at two UK sites, with data collected in participants' homes or community venues. Participants were randomised using an online central allocation service. The intervention, comprising the prototype "Living Well, Taking Control" (LWTC) programme, involved four weekly two-hour group sessions held in local community venues to promote changes in diet and physical activity, plus planned follow-up contacts at two, three, six, nine and 12 months alongside 5 hours of additional activities/classes. Waiting list controls received usual care for 6 months before accessing the programme. The primary outcome was weight loss at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure, physical activity, diet, health status and well-being. Only researchers conducting analyses were blinded. Results: The target sample of 314 participants (157 each arm) was largely representative of local populations, including 44% men, 26% from ethnic minorities and 33% living in deprived areas. Primary outcome data were available for 285 (91%) participants (141 intervention, 144 control). Between baseline and 6 months, intervention participants on average lost more weight than controls (- 1.7 kg, 95% CI - 2.59 to - 0.85). Higher attendance was associated with greater weight loss (- 3.0 kg, 95% CI - 4.5 to - 1.5). The prototype LWTC programme more than doubled the proportion of participants losing > 5% of their body weight (21% intervention vs. 8% control, OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.36 to 5.90) and improved self-reported dietary behaviour and health status. There were no impacts on HbA1c, blood pressure, physical activity and well-being at 6 months and, amongst intervention participants, few further changes from six to 12-months (e.g. average weight re-gain 0.36 kg, 95% CI - 0.20 to 0.91). There were no serious adverse events but four exercise-related injuries were reported in the intervention arm. Conclusions: This voluntary sector-led diabetes prevention programme reached a broad spectrum of the population and had modest effects on weight-related outcomes, but limited impacts on other diabetes risk factors. Trial registration: Trial registration number: ISRCTN70221670, 5 September 2014 Funder (National Institute for Health Research School for Public Health Research) project reference number: SPHR-EXE-PES-COM
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Enlighten
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:205660
Last time updated on 21/07/2020
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 25/10/2020
UWE Bristol Research Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:uwe-repository.worktribe.c...
Last time updated on 08/06/2020
University of Melbourne Institutional Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:jupiter.its.unimelb.edu.au...
Last time updated on 19/11/2020
Supporting member
Open Research Exeter
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:ore.exeter.ac.uk:10871/398...
Last time updated on 13/12/2019
University of Birmingham Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:publications...
Last time updated on 14/12/2019
University of Birmingham Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:openaire_cri...
Last time updated on 14/12/2019