CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Research
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Effects of Irradiation Temperature on the Response of CeO2, ThO2, and UO2 to Highly Ionizing Radiation
Authors
W. F. Cureton
R. C. Ewing
+7 more
M. Lang
E. C. O'Quinn
R. I. Palomares
M. Toulemonde
C. L. Tracy
J. Walters
M. Zdorovets
Publication date
1 January 2019
Publisher
'Elsevier BV'
Abstract
Microcrystalline CeO2, ThO2, and UO2 were irradiated with 198 MeV 132Xe ions to the same fluence at temperatures ranging from 25 °C to 700 °C then characterized by synchrotron X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. All samples retain crystallinity and their nominal fluorite-type phase at a fluence of 1.5 × 1013 ions/cm2. Both CeO2 and ThO2 display defect-induced unit cell expansion after irradiation at room temperature (∼0.15% and ∼0.10%, respectively), yet as irradiation temperature increases, the maximum swelling produced decreases to ∼0.02%. Alternatively, UO2 shows an initial contraction in unit cell parameter (approximately −0.05%) for room temperature irradiation, most likely related to irradiation-enhanced annealing or irradiation-induced oxidation. At higher temperatures (above 200 °C) UO2 begins to swell, surpassing its unit cell parameter prior to irradiation (∼0.05%), an effect which could be attributed to minor reduction in uranium oxidation state in vacuum. However, while CeO2 irradiated at room temperature undergoes partial reduction, both UO2 and ThO2 exhibit no measurable change in cation oxidation state as evidenced by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. All samples display a decrease in irradiation-induced heterogeneous microstrain as a function of increasing irradiation temperature. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.This work was supported by the Energy Frontier Research Center Materials Science of Actinides funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (DE-SC0001089). Portions of this work were performed at HPCAT (Sector 16), Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. HPCAT operations are supported by DOE-NNSA under award No. DE-NA0001974 and DOE-BES under award No. DE-FG02-99ER45775, with partial instrumentation funding by NSF. APS is supported by DOE-BES, under contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. W.F.C. and R.I.P. gratefully acknowledge support from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) through the Capital/DOE Alliance Center (DE-NA0003858). HPCAT beamtime was granted by the Capital/DOE Alliance Center
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Institutional repository of Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:elar.urfu.ru:10995/111993
Last time updated on 17/05/2022