CORE
🇺🇦Â
 make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Collinear antiferromagnetic phases of a frustrated spin-
1
2
\frac{1}{2}
2
1
​
J
1
J_{1}
J
1
​
--
J
2
J_{2}
J
2
​
--
J
1
⊥
J_{1}^{\perp}
J
1
⊥
​
Heisenberg model on an
A
A
AA
AA
-stacked bilayer honeycomb lattice
Authors
R. F. Bishop
P. H. Y. Li
Publication date
1 January 2019
Publisher
'Elsevier BV'
Doi
Cite
View
on
arXiv
Abstract
The zero-temperature quantum phase diagram of the spin-
1
2
\frac{1}{2}
2
1
​
J
1
J_{1}
J
1
​
--
J
2
J_{2}
J
2
​
--
J
1
⊥
J_{1}^{\perp}
J
1
⊥
​
model on an
A
A
AA
AA
-stacked bilayer honeycomb lattice is investigated using the coupled cluster method (CCM). The model comprises two monolayers in each of which the spins, residing on honeycomb-lattice sites, interact via both nearest-neighbor (NN) and frustrating next-nearest-neighbor isotropic antiferromagnetic (AFM) Heisenberg exchange iteractions, with respective strengths
J
1
>
0
J_{1} > 0
J
1
​
>
0
and
J
2
≡
κ
J
1
>
0
J_{2} \equiv \kappa J_{1}>0
J
2
​
≡
κ
J
1
​
>
0
. The two layers are coupled via a comparable Heisenberg exchange interaction between NN interlayer pairs, with a strength
J
1
⊥
≡
δ
J
1
J_{1}^{\perp} \equiv \delta J_{1}
J
1
⊥
​
≡
δ
J
1
​
. The complete phase boundaries of two quasiclassical collinear AFM phases, namely the N\'{e}el and N\'{e}el-II phases, are calculated in the
κ
δ
\kappa \delta
κ
δ
half-plane with
κ
>
0
\kappa > 0
κ
>
0
. Whereas on each monolayer in the N\'{e}el state all NN pairs of spins are antiparallel, in the N\'{e}el-II state NN pairs of spins on zigzag chains along one of the three equivalent honeycomb-lattice directions are antiparallel, while NN interchain spins are parallel. We calculate directly in the thermodynamic (infinite-lattice) limit both the magnetic order parameter
M
M
M
and the excitation energy
Δ
\Delta
Δ
from the
s
T
z
=
0
s^{z}_{T}=0
s
T
z
​
=
0
ground state to the lowest-lying
∣
s
T
z
∣
=
1
|s^{z}_{T}|=1
∣
s
T
z
​
∣
=
1
excited state (where
s
T
z
s^{z}_{T}
s
T
z
​
is the total
z
z
z
component of spin for the system as a whole, and where the collinear ordering lies along the
z
z
z
direction) for both quasiclassical states used (separately) as the CCM model state, on top of which the multispin quantum correlations are then calculated to high orders (
n
≤
10
n \leq 10
n
≤
10
) in a systematic series of approximations involving
n
n
n
-spin clusters. The sole approximation made is then to extrapolate the sequences of
n
n
n
th-order results for
M
M
M
and
Δ
\Delta
Δ
to the exact limit,
n
→
∞
n \to \infty
n
→
∞
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
The University of Manchester - Institutional Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:publications...
Last time updated on 05/04/2019