First-Principles Study
on Structural
Properties and 4f → 5d Transitions of Locally Charge-Compensated
Ce<sup>3+</sup> in CaF<sub>2</sub>
- Publication date
- Publisher
Abstract
The structural properties and 4f → 5d transitions
of Ce<sup>3+</sup> in CaF<sub>2</sub>, with local charge compensation
by an
interstitial fluoride (F<sub>i</sub>′) or an oxygen substitution
for fluoride (O<sub>F</sub>′), have been studied using the
density functional theory (DFT) within the supercell model and the
wave function-based embedded cluster calculations, respectively. The
DFT results indicate that the incorporation of locally charge-compensated
Ce<sup>3+</sup> in CaF<sub>2</sub> induces an anisotropic distortion
of the structure around the dopant site. On the basis of the DFT-optimized
structures, the Ce-centered embedded clusters are constructed, on
which the wave function-based CASSCF/CASPT2/RASSI–SO calculations
at the spin–orbit level are performed to obtain the Ce<sup>3+</sup> 4f<sup>1</sup> and 5d<sup>1</sup> level energies. The calculated
4f–5d transition energies and relative intensities are in good
agreement with available experimental results. From the present calculations,
we conclude that the 5d<sup>1</sup> level missing in the low-temperature
absorption spectrum of the tetragonal Ce center with F<sub>i</sub>′ compensation is the second-lowest one, and the absorption
at this level is overshadowed by an adjacent cluster band usually
assigned to Ce clusters and thus was not observed in experiments.
We also assign the two closely spaced absorption lines around 3118.5
Å observed in experiments to the lowest two quasi-degenerated
4f → 5d transitions of the monoclinic center with F<sub>i</sub>′ compensation rather than those of the trigonal center as
proposed earlier. Finally, we analyze the structural and electronic
reasons for the large reduction (∼2000 cm<sup>–1</sup>) of the lowest 4f → 5d transition energy from a F<sub>i</sub>′ to a nearest-neighbor O<sub>F</sub>′ compensation,
in terms of the changes in the centroid energy difference and crystal-field
splitting