Chemical Manipulation
of Magnetic Ordering in Mn<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>Sn<sub><i>x</i></sub>Bi<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>4</sub> Solid–Solutions
- Publication date
- Publisher
Abstract
Several compositions of manganese–tin–bismuth
selenide
solid–solution series, Mn<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>Sn<sub><i>x</i></sub>Bi<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>4</sub> (<i>x</i> = 0, 0.3, 0.75), were synthesized by combining high purity
elements in the desired ratio at moderate temperatures. X-ray single
crystal studies of a Mn-rich composition (<i>x</i> = 0)
and a Mn-poor phase (<i>x</i> = 0.75) at 100 and 300 K revealed
that the compounds crystallize isostructurally in the monoclinic space
group <i>C</i>2/<i>m</i> (no.12) and adopt the
MnSb<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>4</sub> structure type. Direct current (DC)
magnetic susceptibility measurements in the temperature range from
2 to 300 K indicated that the dominant magnetic ordering within the
Mn<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>Sn<sub><i>x</i></sub>Bi<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>4</sub> solid–solutions below 50 K switches
from antiferromagnetic (AFM) for MnBi<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>4</sub> (<i>x</i> = 0), to ferromagnetic (FM) for Mn<sub>0.7</sub>Sn<sub>0.3</sub>Bi<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>4</sub> (<i>x</i> = 0.3),
and finally to paramagnetic (PM) for Mn<sub>0.25</sub>Sn<sub>0.75</sub>Bi<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>4</sub> (<i>x</i> = 0.75). We show
that this striking variation in the nature of magnetic ordering within
the Mn<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>Sn<sub><i>x</i></sub>Bi<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>4</sub> solid–solution series can
be rationalized by taking into account: (1) changes in the distribution
of magnetic centers within the structure arising from the Mn to Sn
substitutions, (2) the contributions of spin-polarized free charge
carriers resulting from the intermixing of Mn and Sn within the same
crystallographic site, and (3) a possible long-range ordering of Mn
and Sn atoms within individual {M}<sub><i>n</i></sub>Se<sub>4<i>n</i>+2</sub> single chain leading to quasi isolated
{MnSe<sub>6</sub>} octahedra spaced by nonmagnetic {SnSe<sub>6</sub>} octahedra