Apparent survival rate (<i>φ</i>) estimates (and standard errors) are based on data collected on two 100-ha plots in Ecuador, 2001–2012.
- Publication date
- Publisher
Abstract
<p>Results are based on the first six years of data (2001–2006; see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0081028#pone.0081028-Blake2" target="_blank">[8]</a>) and for the full 12 years. Competitive models (ΔAIC<sub>c</sub><2.0) are ordered by AICc rankings for the full 12-year results; corresponding results from the reduced data set of 2006 follow that ranking (estimates for some species were not calculated for the reduced data set). Estimates are shown for both the first (<i>φ<sub>1</sub></i>) and subsequent capture periods [<i>φ<sub>2</sub></i>, i.e., TSM models, e.g. <i>φ</i>(2./.)p(.)] for the full data set (2001–2012) but only <i>φ<sub>2</sub></i> for the reduced set (2001–2006 data).</p>a<p>I/R - number of individuals captured/number of recaptures (excluding individuals only captured during the final sample) over the 12-year period.</p>b<p>ΔAIC<sub>c</sub> - differences in AIC<sub>c</sub>.</p>c<p><i>w<sub>i</sub></i> - relative strength (weight) of evidence for selected models.</p>d<p>Model included <i>p</i>(t) rather than <i>p</i>(.).</p
