Abstract

An amide-bound [Fe<sub>4</sub>S<sub>4</sub>]<sup>3+</sup> cluster, [Fe<sub>4</sub>S<sub>4</sub>{N­(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>4</sub>]<sup>−</sup> (<b>1</b>), was found to serve as a convenient precursor for synthetic analogues of the oxidized form of high-potential iron–sulfur proteins. Treatment of <b>1</b> with 4 equiv of bulky thiols led to replacement of the amide ligands with thiolates, giving rise to a series of [Fe<sub>4</sub>S<sub>4</sub>(SR)<sub>4</sub>]<sup>−</sup> clusters (R = Dmp (<b>2a</b>), Tbt (<b>2b</b>), Eind (<b>2c</b>), Dxp (<b>2d</b>), Dpp (<b>2e</b>); Dmp = 2,6-di­(mesityl)­phenyl, Tbt = 2,4,6-tris­[bis­(trimethylsilyl)­methyl]­phenyl, Eind = 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7-octaethyl-<i>s</i>-hydrindacen-4-yl, Dxp = 2,6-di­(<i>m</i>-xylyl)­phenyl, Dpp = 2,6-diphenylphenyl). These clusters were characterized by the mass spectrum, the EPR spectrum, and X-ray crystallography. The redox potentials of the [Fe<sub>4</sub>S<sub>4</sub>]<sup>3+/2+</sup> couple, −0.82 V (<b>2a</b>), −0.86 V (<b>2b</b>), −0.84 V (<b>2c</b>), −0.74 V (<b>2d</b>), and −0.63 V (<b>2e</b>) vs Ag/Ag<sup>+</sup> in THF, are significantly more negative than that of [Fe<sub>4</sub>S<sub>4</sub>(SPh)<sub>4</sub>]<sup>−/2–</sup> (−0.21 V)

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions