Synthesis, Structure, Luminescence, and Magnetic Properties of a Single-Ion Magnet “<i>mer</i>”‑[Tris(<i>N</i>‑[(imidazol-4-yl)-methylidene]-dl-phenylalaninato)terbium(III) and Related “<i>fac</i>”-dl-Alaninato Derivative

Abstract

Two Tb<sup>III</sup> complexes with the same N<sub>6</sub>O<sub>3</sub> donor atoms but different coordination geometries, “<i>fac</i>”-[Tb<sup>III</sup>(HL<sup>dl‑ala</sup>)<sub>3</sub>]·7H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>1</b>) and “<i>mer</i>”-[Tb<sup>III</sup>(HL<sup>dl‑phe</sup>)<sub>3</sub>]·7H<sub>2</sub>O (<b>2</b>), were synthesized, where H<sub>2</sub>L<sup>dl‑ala</sup> and H<sub>2</sub>L<sup>dl‑phe</sup> are <i>N</i>-[(imidazol-4-yl)­methylidene]-dl-alanine and -dl-phenylalanine, respectively. Each Tb<sup>III</sup> ion is coordinated by three electronically mononegative NNO tridentate ligands to form a coordination geometry of a tricapped trigonal prism. Compound <b>1</b> consists of enantiomers “<i>fac</i>”-[Tb<sup>III</sup>(HL<sup>d‑ala</sup>)<sub>3</sub>] and “<i>fac</i>”-[Tb<sup>III</sup>(HL<sup>l‑ala</sup>)<sub>3</sub>], while <b>2</b> consists of “<i>mer</i>”-[Tb<sup>III</sup>(HL<sup>d‑phe</sup>)<sub>2</sub>(HL<sup>l‑phe</sup>)] and “<i>mer</i>”-[Tb<sup>III</sup>(HL<sup>d‑phe</sup>)­(HL<sup>l‑phe</sup>)<sub>2</sub>]. Magnetic data were analyzed by a spin Hamiltonian including the crystal field effect on the Tb<sup>III</sup> ion (4f<sup>8</sup>, <i>J</i> = 6, <i>S</i> = 3, <i>L</i> = 3, <i>g</i><sub><i>J</i></sub> = 3/2, <sup>7</sup>F<sub>6</sub>). The Stark splitting of the ground state <sup>7</sup>F<sub>6</sub> was evaluated from magnetic analysis, and the energy diagram pattern indicated easy-plane and easy-axis (Ising type) magnetic anisotropies for <b>1</b> and <b>2</b>, respectively. Highly efficient luminescences with Φ = 0.50 and 0.61 for <b>1</b> and <b>2</b>, respectively, were observed, and the luminescence fine structure due to the <sup>5</sup>D<sub>4</sub> → <sup>7</sup>F<sub>6</sub> transition is in good accordance with the energy diagram determined from magnetic analysis. The energy diagram of <b>1</b> shows an approximate single-well potential curve, whereas that of <b>2</b> shows a double- or quadruple-well potential within the <sup>7</sup>F<sub>6</sub> multiplets. Complex <b>2</b> displayed an onset of the out-of-phase signal in alternating current (ac) susceptibility at a direct current bias field of 1000 Oe on cooling down to 1.9 K. A slight frequency dependence was recorded around 2 K. On the other hand, <b>1</b> did not show any meaningful out-of-phase ac susceptibility. Pulsed-field magnetizations of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> were measured below 1.6 K, and only <b>2</b> exhibited magnetic hysteresis. This finding agrees well with the energy diagram pattern from crystal field calculation on <b>1</b> and <b>2</b>. DFT calculation allowed us to estimate the negative charge distribution around the Tb<sup>III</sup> ion, giving a rationale to the different magnetic anisotropies of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b>

    Similar works