Physiological and Molecular Response of <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> (L.) to Nanoparticle Cerium and Indium Oxide Exposure

Abstract

The effects of cerium oxide (CeO<sub>2</sub>) and indium oxide (In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) nanoparticles (NPs) exposure on <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> (L.) Heynh. were investigated. After inoculation in half strength MS medium amended with 0–2000 ppm CeO<sub>2</sub> and In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> NPs for 25 days, both physiological and molecular responses were evaluated. Exposure at 250 ppm CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs significantly increased plant biomass, but at 500–2000 ppm, plant growth was decreased by up to 85% in a dose-dependent fashion. At 1000 and 2000 ppm CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs, chlorophyll production was reduced by nearly 60% and 85%, respectively, and anthocyanin production was increased 3–5-fold. Malondialdehyde (MDA) production, a measure of lipid peroxidation, was unaffected by exposure to 250–500 ppm CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs, but at 1000 ppm, MDA formation was increased by 2.5-fold. Exposure to 25–2000 ppm In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> NPs had no effect on <i>A. thaliana</i> biomass and only minor effects (15%) on root elongation. Total chlorophyll and MDA production were unaffected by In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> NPs exposure. Molecular response to NP exposure as measured by qPCR showed that both types of elements altered the expression of genes central to the stress response such as the sulfur assimilation and glutathione (GSH) biosynthesis pathway, a series of genes known to be significant in the detoxification of metal toxicity in plants. Interestingly, In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> NPs exposure resulted in a 3.8–4.6-fold increase in glutathione synthase (GS) transcript production, whereas CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs yielded only a 2-fold increase. It seems likely that the significantly greater gene regulation response upon In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> NPs exposure was directly related to the decreased phytotoxicity relative to CeO<sub>2</sub> treatment. The use of NP rare earth oxide elements has increased dramatically, yet knowledge on fate and toxicity has lagged behind. To our knowledge, this is the first report evaluating both physiological and molecular plant response from exposure to these important nanoparticles

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions