Physiological and Molecular Response of <i>Arabidopsis
thaliana</i> (L.) to Nanoparticle Cerium and Indium Oxide Exposure
- Publication date
- Publisher
Abstract
The effects of cerium oxide (CeO<sub>2</sub>) and indium oxide
(In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) nanoparticles (NPs) exposure on <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i> (L.) Heynh. were investigated. After
inoculation in half strength MS medium amended with 0–2000
ppm CeO<sub>2</sub> and In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> NPs for 25 days,
both physiological and molecular responses were evaluated. Exposure
at 250 ppm CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs significantly increased plant biomass,
but at 500–2000 ppm, plant growth was decreased by up to 85%
in a dose-dependent fashion. At 1000 and 2000 ppm CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs,
chlorophyll production was reduced by nearly 60% and 85%, respectively,
and anthocyanin production was increased 3–5-fold. Malondialdehyde
(MDA) production, a measure of lipid peroxidation, was unaffected
by exposure to 250–500 ppm CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs, but at 1000
ppm, MDA formation was increased by 2.5-fold. Exposure to 25–2000
ppm In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> NPs had no effect on <i>A. thaliana</i> biomass and only minor effects (15%) on root elongation. Total chlorophyll
and MDA production were unaffected by In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> NPs
exposure. Molecular response to NP exposure as measured by qPCR showed
that both types of elements altered the expression of genes central
to the stress response such as the sulfur assimilation and glutathione
(GSH) biosynthesis pathway, a series of genes known to be significant
in the detoxification of metal toxicity in plants. Interestingly,
In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> NPs exposure resulted in a 3.8–4.6-fold
increase in glutathione synthase (GS) transcript production, whereas
CeO<sub>2</sub> NPs yielded only a 2-fold increase. It seems likely
that the significantly greater gene regulation response upon In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> NPs exposure was directly related to the decreased
phytotoxicity relative to CeO<sub>2</sub> treatment. The use of NP
rare earth oxide elements has increased dramatically, yet knowledge
on fate and toxicity has lagged behind. To our knowledge, this is
the first report evaluating both physiological and molecular plant
response from exposure to these important nanoparticles