Significance of Surface Formate Coverage on the Reaction
Kinetics of Methanol Synthesis from CO<sub>2</sub> Hydrogenation over
Cu
- Publication date
- Publisher
Abstract
The
hydrogenation of CO<sub>2</sub> to methanol over copper-based
catalysts has attracted considerable attention recently. Among all
the proposed reaction mechanisms, a large number of experimental and
theoretical studies have focused on the one that includes a HCOO intermediate
due to the fact that high coverages of formate over catalyst surfaces
were observed experimentally. To systematically understand the influence
of formate species coverage on the reaction kinetics of methanol synthesis,
the energetics of the CO<sub>2</sub> hydrogenation pathway over clean
and one- or two-formate preadsorbed Cu(211) are obtained using density
functional theory calculations, and these energetics are further employed
for microkinetic modeling. We find that the adsorption energies of
the intermediates and transition states involved in the reaction pathway
are changed in the presence of spectating formate species, and consequently,
the potential energy diagrams are varied. Microkinetic analysis shows
that the turnover frequencies (TOFs) over different formate preadsorbed
surfaces vary under the same reaction condition. In particular, the
reaction rates obtained over clean Cu(211) are generally the lowest,
while those over one- or two-formate preadsorbed surfaces depend on
the reaction temperatures and pressures. Meanwhile, we find that only
when the formate coverage effect is considered, some of the TOFs obtained
from microkinetic modeling are in fair agreement with previous experimental
results under similar conditions. After the degree of rate control
analysis, it is found that the combination of HCOO and HCOOH hydrogenation
steps can be treated as the “effective rate-determining step”,
which can be written as HCOO* + 2H* → H<sub>2</sub>COOH* +
2*. Therefore, the formation of methanol is mainly controlled by the
surface coverage of formate and hydrogen at the steady state, as well
as the free energy barriers of the effective rate-determining step,
i.e., effective free energy barriers