SARTINI.  A.  320  070  087.    SOCIAL  DISCRIMINATION  IN  MICHAEL 

LEMBECK  THE  CLIQUE  MOVIE  (2008):  MARXIST  CRITICISM 

RESEARCH PAPER. SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION 

MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA. 2011. 

The  object  of  the  study  is  a  movie  The  Clique  directed  by  Michael 

Lembeck.  The  study  is  about  social  discrimination  between Messei  and  Claire 

directed by Michael Lembeck published  in 2008. The objective of  the study  is  to 

analyze the structural elements  in the movie and to analyze women emancipation 

of the movie based on feminist approach. 

The  researcher employs  the descriptive qualitative  research as a  type of 

the  research. The data sources are divided  into  two, namely primary data source 

and secondary data source. The primary data source is the events of the movie and 

script of The Clique and the secondary data source  is biography of character. The 

method  of  collecting  data  is  documentation. The  technique  of  analyzing  data  is 

descriptive. 

The  result  of  the  study  is  as  follows;  First,  based  on  the  structural 

analysis, Michael Lembeck delivers a moral message  that human being are more 

than  their  economic  status.  Second,  based  on  the  Marxist  analysis,  Michael 

Lembeck reflects that upper class ad lower class are equal

SARTINI  , SARTINI

UMS Digital Library - Selamat datang di UMS Digital Library

i  SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION IN MICHAEL LEMBECK THE CLIQUE  MOVIE (2008): MARXIST CRITICISM     RESEARCH PAPER  Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education in English Department   by  SARTINI A 320 070 087   SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA 2011     ii  APPROVAL  SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION IN MICHAEL LEMBECK THE CLIQUE  MOVIE (2008): MARXIST CRITICISM    Research Paper      Proposed by:  SARTINI A 320 070 087      Approved to be Examined  by Consultant Team           Consultant I                 Consultant II      Drs. M.Thoyibi, M.S.                          Titis Setyabudi, S.S, M.Hum               NIK.410                                                              NIK. 948   iii  ACCEPTANCE  SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION IN MICHAEL LEMBECK THE CLIQUE MOVIE (2008): MARXIST CRITICISM By  SARTINI A320070087  Accepted and approved by the Board of Examiners School of Teacher Training and Education Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta On July ,2011  Team of Examiners; 1. Drs. M.Thoyibi, M.S.    (………………………….) (Chair Person) 2. Titis Setyabudi, S.S,M.Hum                       (………………………….)                      ( Member I)    3. Dr.Phil Dewi Candraningrum, S.Pd. M.Ed (......................................)                                                          (Member II)   Dean   Drs. Sofyan Anif M.Si. NIK. 547   iv  TESTIMONY   I hereby assert that there is no plagiarism in this research paper. There is no other work that has been submitted to obtain the bachelor degree and as far as I am concerned there is no opinion that has been written or published before, except the written references which are referred in this paper and mentioned in the bibliography. If any incorrectness is proved in the future dealing with my statement above, I will be fully responsible.    Surakarta, 04 July 2011 The Writer             Sartini              v  MOTTO   Change a defeat into a victory (David J. Schwartz)   A man  purposes and god disposes  (Writer)                            vi  DEDICATION        For: Allah SWT and Muhammad SAW My beloved Parents My future My life        vii        ACKNOWLEDGEMENT                  Praise to Allah SWT, the Lord of Universe, for blessing and guiding the research paper as a partial fulfillment of the requirement for getting Bachelor Degree in English Department, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.  The researcher is fully aware that people’s help and guidance. Therefore, in this opportunity, she would like to express her gratitude and appreciation to: 1. Drs.H.Sofyan Anif,M.Si. as the Dean of the School of Teacher Training and Education. 2. Titis Setyabudi, S.S, M.Hum. as the Chief of English Department in Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, and the Second Consultant who has improved the writing of research in order to make this research paper more interesting to read in correct sentences. 3. Drs. M. Thoyibi, M.S. as the writer’s Academic Consultant of Teacher Training and Eduacation and also the First Consultant, for the greatest guidance, attention, and motivation from the beginning up to the completing of the research paper.  4. All the staffs of UMS, for the services and helping. 5. All the librarians whose place has been visited by writer to get references. viii  6. Beloved parents, for the unconditional love, prayer, support, patience, care, and all the sacrifices. 7.  Her sweetie brother and sister,Mbak bi and Mas Ruby for all the jokes, care, and support. 8.  Her beloved Grandpas, Grandmas, Uncles, Aunties, Nephews, Cousins, for loves and care. 9. Her dearest friends in B & C classes: Devia, Fatia, Tyan, Anto, Sinta, Neni, Iin, Roma, Dayu,  Eka,  Kiki, Christina,  Arsy,  Hera,  Aya,  Ayu, Widi, Rita, Puput, Septi, Brenda,  Pooh,  Ika, Lila,  Wastu, Amir   and all who cannot mention one by one, for being her best friends and giving the spirit and sweet friendship, 10. Wafda, Saly,  for  helps the writer to conduct this research.  11. Her best friends, sisters at “Tabanas 3”, Puput, Tutut , Atik, Sari, Meldud, Maya, Nophi, Nur, Datik, Dani and Pipit mbk Ika  for togetherness and happiness. 12. Her best friends Yunisha Widyarini, Meila Zuhaida and Erna Dewi.  13. ALL HMP English Department (No exception) for togetherness and help. 14. All MUEC Crew ( No exception)  for everything. 15. Her rivals, for the competition that make writer motivated to be better. 16. Her former boyfriends and secret admires whenever they are. 17. Last but not least, those who cannot be mentioned one by one, who have supported her to reach her dream.  ix   She realizes that this research paper is far from being perfect because of her limited capability. Thus, revision, suggestion, and criticism are welcome for the perfection of this work. She wishes this research paper would be useful and helpful to readers.          Surakarta,  04 July 2011                              Sartini                                x  TABLE OF CONTENT  TITLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .i APPROVAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii ACCEPTANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii TESTIMONY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv MOTTO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . . .v DEDICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  vi ACKNOWLEDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .vii TABLE OF CONTENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x TABLE OF SCREEN CAPTURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiv SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xv CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 B. Literature Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 C. Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 D. Limitation of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 E. Objectives of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 F. Benefits of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 G. Research Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 H. Research Paper Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 CHAPTER II: UNDERLYING THEORY A. Notion of Marxist Criticism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 xi  B.  Basic Principles of the Marxist Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1. Dialectical Materialism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 2. Historical Materialism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . .13 3. Alienation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 4. Class Struggle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 C. Structural Elements of Movie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 D. Theoretical Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 CHAPTER III: SOCIAL HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF AMERICAN SOCIETY  AT THE TURN OF CENTURY A. Social Aspect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 B. Economic Aspect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 C. Politic Aspect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 D. Cultural Aspect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36 E. Religious Aspect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 F. Science and Technology Aspect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 CHAPTER IV: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS  A. Structural elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 1. Narrative Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 a. Character and characterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 1) Major Characters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42 2) Minor Characters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45 b. Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50 xii  1) Setting of Place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50 2) Setting of Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 c. Plot   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 d. Point of View  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  52 e. Theme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53 2. Technical Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53 a. Mise-en-Scene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 1) Costume and Make up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54 2) Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55 a) Frontal Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55 b) Side Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56 c) Back Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 d) Under Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 e) Top Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57  3) Set Dressing and Props . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 b. Casting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 c. Cinematography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 1) Photographic Qualities of Shot. . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 2) Framing of Shot. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63 3) The Duration of Shot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 a) Sound . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 xiii  b) Editing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 B. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 C.  CHAPTER V: MARXIST ANALYSIS OF THE CLIQUE MOVIE (2008) A. Marxist Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 1. Dialectical Materialism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 2. Historical Materialism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 3. Alienation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .75 4. Class Struggle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  76 B. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79 CHAPTER VI: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION A. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 B. Suggestion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .83 BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDIX                xiv   TABLE OF SCREEN CAPTURE SC 1:  Messei’s Profile ..............................................................................................  42 SC 2:  Claire’s profile  ...............................................................................................  44 SC 3:  Dylan’s profile  ...............................................................................................   45  SC 4:  Alicia’s profile  ...............................................................................................   46 SC 5:  Kri’s profile ....................................................................................................  48 SC 6:  Chris’s profile  ................................................................................................  49 SC 7:  Setting of Place  ..............................................................................................  50 SC 8:  Point of view  ..................................................................................................  52 SC 9:  Point of View  .................................................................................................  52 SC 10: Fashion’s style in Modern Era  ........................................................................  54 SC 11:  Make up poeple in dayligh period ....................................................................   55 SC 12:  Make up people in sweat  ................................................................................  55 SC 13:  Frontal Lighting  .............................................................................................  55 SC 14: Side Lighting  ..................................................................................................  56 SC 15:  Back Lighting   ................................................................................................  56 SC 16: Under Lighting  ...............................................................................................   57 SC 17:  Top Lighting   .................................................................................................  58 SC 18:  Frame of each property to show the place  .......................................................   59 SC 19: Frame of each property to show the place ........................................................  59 SC 20: Normal Angel..................................................................................................  62 SC 21: High Angel  .....................................................................................................  62 SC 22: Low Angel ......................................................................................................  63         xv  SUMMARY  SARTINI. A. 320 070 087.  SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION IN MICHAEL LEMBECK THE CLIQUE MOVIE (2008): MARXIST CRITICISM RESEARCH PAPER. SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA. 2011. The object of the study is a movie The Clique directed by Michael Lembeck. The study is about social discrimination between Messei and Claire directed by Michael Lembeck published in 2008. The objective of the study is to analyze the structural elements in the movie and to analyze women emancipation of the movie based on feminist approach. The researcher employs the descriptive qualitative research as a type of the research. The data sources are divided into two, namely primary data source and secondary data source. The primary data source is the events of the movie and script of The Clique and the secondary data source is biography of character. The method of collecting data is documentation. The technique of analyzing data is descriptive. The result of the study is as follows; First, based on the structural analysis, Michael Lembeck delivers a moral message that human being are more than their economic status. Second, based on the Marxist analysis, Michael Lembeck reflects that upper class ad lower class are equal. Keywords: Social Discrimination, The Clique, Marxist Criticism.   First Consultant Second Consultant   (Drs. M. Thoyibi, M.S.)  (Titis Setyabudi, S.S,M.Hum)  NIK. 410 NIK. 948   The Dean of Teacher Training   and Education Faculty    Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M.Si NIK. 547 ii    

SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION IN MICHAEL LEMBECK THE CLIQUE  MOVIE (2008): MARXIST CRITICISM

http://eprints.ums.ac.id/13553/1/COVER-DEDICATION.pdf

SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION IN MICHAEL LEMBECK THE CLIQUE MOVIE (2008): MARXIST CRITICISM

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UMS Digital Library - Selamat datang di UMS Digital Library