CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
A Comparative Study of Plant Sample Preparation by Dry Ashing and Wet Digestion for Isotopic Determination of Cu,Zn and Fe
Authors
吴龙华
朱祥坤
李世珍
骆永明
Publication date
1 January 2011
Publisher
Abstract
测定有机样品中元素含量和同位素时,处理样品常用的方法有干灰化法和湿法两种。目前,测定样品中Cu、Zn、Fe同位素时,多采用湿法处理样品。相对于湿法处理样品,干灰化法溶样迅速、耗酸量少,适合处理大量样品,但高温灼烧过程可能会导致样品中Cu、Zn、Fe同位素的分馏。本研究利用海州香薷植株,以湿法为基础,对干灰化法和湿法处理植物样品的Cu、Zn、Fe同位素组成进行了对比研究,结果如下,在所用实验条件下:1)对于海州香薷的根样品,干灰化法不会导致样品中Cu、Zn、Fe同位素的分馏;2)对于海州香薷的茎样品,灰化法不会导致样品中Cu、Zn同位素的分馏,但会导致Fe同位素的分馏;3)对于海州香薷的叶样品,干灰化法会导致Cu、Fe同位素的分馏,但对样品中Zn同位素没有明显的影响。因此,测定植物样品中Cu、Zn、Fe同位素时,需要根据所测样品和元素的特性,对干法灰化的实用性进行审慎评估。研究结果也表明了干灰化过程中,Cu、Zn、Fe同位素分馏效应不同,表明挥发组分中元素的流失是导致同位素分馏的一个因素,但全样和挥发组分中元素同位素组成的差别及元素损失的相对量影响了干灰化过程导致的同位素分馏程度
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Institutional Repository of Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, CAS
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:ir.yic.ac.cn:133337/27055
Last time updated on 24/06/2021