The article deals with the ruthenium complexes, [(bpy)Ru(Q′)2] (1–3)
incorporating two unsymmetrical redox-noninnocent iminoquinone moieties [bpy =
2,2′-bipyridine; Q′ = 3,5-di-tert-butyl-N-aryl-1,2-benzoquinonemonoimine, aryl
= C6H5 (Q′1), 1; m-Cl2C6H3 (Q′2), 2; m-(OCH3)2C6H3 (Q′3), 3]. 1 and 3 have
been preferentially stabilised in the cc-isomeric form while both the ct- and
cc-isomeric forms of 2 are isolated [ct: cis and trans and cc: cis and cis
with respect to the mutual orientations of O and N donors of two Q′]. The
isomeric identities of 1–3 have been authenticated by their single-crystal
X-ray structures. The collective consideration of crystallographic and DFT
data along with other analytical events reveals that 1–3 exhibit the valence
configuration of [(bpy)RuII(Q′Sq)2]. The magnetization studies reveal a
ferromagnetic response at 300 K and virtual diamagnetic behaviour at 2 K. DFT
calculations on representative 2a and 2b predict that the excited triplet (S =
1) state is lying close to the singlet (S = 0) ground state with
singlet–triplet separation of 0.038 eV and 0.075 eV, respectively. In
corroboration with the paramagnetic features the complexes exhibit free
radical EPR signals with g [similar]2 and 1HNMR spectra with broad aromatic
proton signals associated with the Q′ at 300 K. Experimental results in
conjunction with the DFT (for representative 2a and 2b) reveal iminoquinone
based preferential electron-transfer processes leaving the ruthenium(II) ion
mostly as a redox insensitive entity: [(bpy)RuII(Q′Q)2]2+ (12+–32+)
[leftrightharpoons] [(bpy)RuII(Q′Sq)(Q′Q)]+ (1+–3+) [leftrightharpoons]
[(bpy)RuII(Q′Sq)2] (1–3) [leftrightharpoons]
[(bpy)RuII(Q′Sq)(Q′Cat)]−/[(bpy)RuIII(Q′Cat)2]− (1−–3−). The diamagnetic
doubly oxidised state, [(bpy)RuII(Q′Q)2]2+ in 12+–32+ has been authenticated
further by the crystal structure determination of the representative
[(bpy)RuII(Q′3)2](ClO4)2 [3](ClO4)2 as well as by its sharp 1H NMR spectrum.
The key electronic transitions in each redox state of 1n–3n have been assigned
by TD–DFT calculations on representative 2a and 2b