Purpose: Microglia are macrophages that are found primarily in the CNS and play a crucial role in maintaining a healthy brain by engulfing invading microorganisms, releasing inflammatory mediators, and pruning dead cells. Microglia can become activated in response to certain stimuli which causes them to transition into a pro-inflammatory state, and can sometimes become chronically activated which can result in neuronal damage. Studies have shown a causal relationship between this activation and sugars such as fructose and glucose. We sought to understand the role of sugars in microglial activation and the subsequent effects on neuron health.
Methods: Rat microglia (HAPI) and neuronal (B35) cell lines were treated with varying concentrations of fructose (25 mM, 12.5 mM, and 6.25 mM) or glucose (25 mM and 12.5 mM)as a positive control to determine their effects on the cells. Following treatment and incubation for 3 or 24 hours, the cells were analyzed using an MTT assay to measure cell survival or real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to measure gene expression levels. Effects of fructose were measured in HAPI microglia after direct treatment with the sugar. The genes investigated by the RT-PCR in the HAPI cells included: glucose transporter 5 (GLUT5), and the inflammatory markers high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), and prostaglandin E receptor 2 (Ptger2). To evaluate the effects of microglial activation on neuronal function, the B35 neurons were treated either directly with sugars or with the supernatant collected from fructose-treated HAPI microglia. This allows examination of the effects of soluble neuron-injury factors released by microglia. The genes investigated by RT-PCR in B35 neurons included nuclear factor-κB (NFκB) and enolase 2 (Eno2).
Results: Cell survival assays showed that 24-hour direct fructose treatment increased B35 cell survival by up to 13%, while groups treated with microglia supernatant increased cell survival by up to 33%. In HAPI microglia, 3 hours of treatment with fructose caused GLUT5 expression to be suppressed by up to 32% in all treatment groups except for 6.25 mM fructose, while Ptger2 and HMGB1 expression was increased by as much as 65% and 15%, respectively. After 24-hours of treatment with fructose, the HAPI microglia showed a maximum of 80% increased expression of HMGB1, while Ptger2 expression was mostly unchanged. In B35 neurons, 3 hours of treatment with fructose caused a decrease of up to 26% in NFκB and an increase of up to 46% in Eno2 expression.
Conclusion: Cell survival results indicate that the microglia may provide a short term protective effect on the B35 neurons. However, data from the gene expression assays show evidence of cellular dysfunction in neurons and pro-inflammatory activity in microglia which may lead to neuronal death on a longer timeline. As seen in the gene expression results, microglia had increased expression of pro-inflammatory genes and B35 neuronal cells had increased expression of markers of cellular damage. Future studies will further explore the effects of fructose on expression of other genes and examine the effects on neuron survival at later time points
