Contains fulltext :
                  67857.pdf ( ) (Open Access)1 p

A Hammer

Anke Hammer

B Schmitt

Bernadette M Jansma

GR Kuperberg

JJA van Berkum

JW King

KD Federmeier

L Osterhout

M Kutas

M Matzke

MA Gernsbacher

MJ Lamers

Monique J Lamers

RH Baayen

S Foraker

S Garrod

SC Garrod

TF Munte

TF Münte

Thomas F Münte

English

PubMed

Background: The present study examines the involvement of syntactic and semantic/conceptual processes in the comprehension of pronouns in Dutch using the technique of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) replicating and extending an earlier study in German. Dutch and German are closely related and share the same logic in referring to non-diminutive and diminutive NPs (i. e. adding an affix which changes the syntactic gender into neutral). Both languages separate male (hij/er (he)) and female pronouns (zij/sie (she)), as well as a pronoun that refers to an entity of neutral gender, (het/es ( it)). However, the neutral pronoun het in Dutch is not only a pronoun, it also is the article of a neutral noun. To investigate the influence of this word class ambiguity on pronoun resolution, as well as to establish the generality of the finding of the German study we manipulated syntactic and biological gender congruency between a personal pronoun and its antecedent in Dutch. Results: In Dutch, sentences with the word-class (pronoun/article) ambiguous pronoun het elicited an early negative shift (150-280 ms) which continued in the time frame of the N400. For sentences with a syntactically and biologically incongruent pronoun a P600 ( in absence of an N400) was obtained, which was independent of the morphological form of the referent. Conclusion: The neurophysiological pattern found for Dutch stimuli was clearly different from the German study, indicating that the processing of pronouns in these two languages differs. This can be explained in terms of language specific characteristics concerning the word class ambiguous neutral pronoun het. Moreover, in contrast to the findings in the German study, there was no clear effect caused by the morphological form of the referent. Additionally, in Dutch, the pronoun resolution in sentences with a non-diminutive antecedent seems to reflect processes of revision ( P600 in absence of an N400), whereas for German evidence was found for clear involvement of conceptual/semantic processes as well as structure building processes (N400/P600 complex)

Lamers, Monique

Jansma-Schmitt, B.M.

Hammer, A.

Münte, T.F.

Maastricht University Research Portal

Differences in the processing of anaphoric reference between closely related languages: neurophysiological evidence

Thomas F Munte

Springer - Publisher Connector

Lamers, M.J.A.

Jansma, B.M.

NARCIS 

Differences in the processing of anaphoric reference between closely related languages: neurophysical evidence

Radboud Repository

Abstract Background The present study examines the involvement of syntactic and semantic/conceptual processes in the comprehension of pronouns in Dutch using the technique of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) replicating and extending an earlier study in German. Dutch and German are closely related and share the same logic in referring to non-diminutive and diminutive NPs (i.e. adding an affix which changes the syntactic gender into neutral). Both languages separate male (hij/er (he)) and female pronouns (zij/sie (she)), as well as a pronoun that refers to an entity of neutral gender, (het/es (it)). However, the neutral pronoun het in Dutch is not only a pronoun, it also is the article of a neutral noun. To investigate the influence of this word class ambiguity on pronoun resolution, as well as to establish the generality of the finding of the German study we manipulated syntactic and biological gender congruency between a personal pronoun and its antecedent in Dutch. Results In Dutch, sentences with the word-class (pronoun/article) ambiguous pronoun het elicited an early negative shift (150–280 ms) which continued in the time frame of the N400. For sentences with a syntactically and biologically incongruent pronoun a P600 (in absence of an N400) was obtained, which was independent of the morphological form of the referent. Conclusion The neurophysiological pattern found for Dutch stimuli was clearly different from the German study, indicating that the processing of pronouns in these two languages differs. This can be explained in terms of language specific characteristics concerning the word class ambiguous neutral pronoun het. Moreover, in contrast to the findings in the German study, there was no clear effect caused by the morphological form of the referent. Additionally, in Dutch, the pronoun resolution in sentences with a non-diminutive antecedent seems to reflect processes of revision (P600 in absence of an N400), whereas for German evidence was found for clear involvement of conceptual/semantic processes as well as structure building processes (N400/P600 complex).</p

Hammer Anke

Jansma Bernadette M

Lamers Monique J

Münte Thomas F

Directory of Open Access Journals

BMC Neuroscience

Crossref

AJ: Resolving sentences in a discourse context.

Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: No evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia

Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context. Brain a journal of neurology 2000,

Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Event-related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree.

Event-related brainpotentials in the study of human cognition and neuropsychology.

Kutas M: Is she an engineer? (poster). Cognitive Neuroscience Society:

McElree B: The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations.

Mechanisms That Improve Referential Access. Cognition

Munte T: The costs of freedom: An ERP-study of non-canonical sentences. Clinical Neurophysiology

Münte TF: Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing.

Münte TF: Language.

Munte TF: Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns: evidence from German and Dutch.

Munte TF: Pronominal Reference in Sentences about Persons or Things: An Electrophysiological Approach.

Petten CKV: Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994–2005).

Petten CKV: Psycholinguistics electrified: eventrelated brain potential investigations.

PJ: Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research

Potentials Elicited by Garden-Path Sentences: Evidence of the Application of Verb Information During Parsing.

Resolving pronouns and other anaphoric devices: The case for diversity in discourse processing. In Perspectives on sentence processing Edited by: Clifton C Jr, Frazier L, Hillsdale NJ. England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;

S: Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects. Neuropsychologia

The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Concortium,

The Contribution of Lexical and Situational Knowledge to Resolving Discourse Roles: Bonding and Resolution.

file:///data/remote/core/dit/data/Springer-OA/pdf/69f/aHR0cDovL2xpbmsuc3ByaW5nZXIuY29tLzEwLjExODYvMTQ3MS0yMjAyLTktNTUucGRm.pdf

Differences in the processing of anaphoric reference between closely related languages: neurophysiological evidence

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Maastricht University Research Portal

Springer - Publisher Connector

NARCIS

NARCIS

Radboud Repository

Springer - Publisher Connector

Directory of Open Access Journals

Crossref

Maastricht University Research Portal