Detection of the knockdown efficiency of different siRNAs.

Abstract

(A) Knockdown efficiency of three siRNAs against circMEF2A1 analyzed by qRT-PCR, and siRNA-3 was chosen for further analysis and named si-circMEF2A1 in the main documents, n = 3. (B) Knockdown efficiency of three siRNAs against PPP3CA analyzed by qRT-PCR, siRNA-2 was chosen for further analysis and named si-PPP3CA in the main documents, n = 3. (C) Knockdown efficiency of three siRNAs against circMEF2A2 analyzed by qRT-PCR, siRNA-2 was chosen for further analysis and named si-circMEF2A2 in the main documents, n = 3. (D) Knockdown efficiency of three siRNAs against SLIT3 analyzed by qRT-PCR, siRNA-3 was chosen for further analysis and named si-SLIT3 in the main documents, n = 3. (E) Knockdown efficiency of three siRNAs against ROBO2 analyzed by qRT-PCR, siRNA-3 was chosen for further analysis and named si-ROBO2 in the main documents, n = 3. (F) Knockdown efficiency of three siRNAs against MEF2A analyzed by qRT-PCR, siRNA-2 was chosen for further analysis and named si-MEF2A in the main documents, n = 3. (G) Knockdown efficiency of two siRNAs against mmu-circMef2a1 analyzed by qRT-PCR, siRNA-2 was chosen for further analysis and named si-mmu-circMef2a1 in the main documents, n = 3. (H) Knockdown efficiency of two siRNAs against mmu-circMef2a2 analyzed by qRT-PCR, siRNA-1 was chosen for further analysis and named si-mmu-circMef2a2 in the main documents, n = 3. Data were displayed as mean ± SEM, independent sample t-test was used to analyze the statistical differences between each dataset, **P P (TIF)</p