In this study, we
aim to compare the changes in the luminescence
properties of Ga2O3:Cr3+ modified
by Al or Sc ion substitution (chemical pressure) and hydrostatic pressure.
We find the same behavior for Ga2–xAlxO3:Cr3+ and
different behavior for Ga2–xScxO3:Cr3+ in terms of
the optical properties under chemical and mechanical pressure. We
consider Al substitution, which does not affect the chemical bond
angles in the Cr3+ local environment and changes the crystal
volume, like mechanical pressure does. As confirmed by Raman spectroscopy,
the Sc ions cause lattice distortion and influence the chemical bond
lengths and angles in the Cr3+ local environment. The energy
structure diagrams of all levels of the d3 configuration
of the Cr3+ ion as a function of pressure are calculated
by considering the pressure dependence of the Racah parameters. The
energy structure diagrams presented in the paper show a decrease in
the energy of the 2E, 2T1, and 2T2 excited levels with an increase in Dq. This
does not align with the behavior predicted for these excited levels
by the standard Tanabe–Sugano diagram. It seems correct that
a high-pressure experiment involving Cr3+ and other transition
metals should be interpreted using the method and diagrams presented
herein