The five-coordinate parent amido complex (PCP)Ru(CO)(NH2) (2) (PCP = 2,6-(CH2PtBu2)2C6H3) has been prepared by two independent routes that involve deprotonation of Ru(II) ammine complexes. Complex 2 reacts with phenylacetylene to yield the Ru(II) acetylide
complex (PCP)Ru(CO)(C⋮CPh) (5) and ammonia. In addition, complex 2 rapidly activates
dihydrogen at room temperature to yield ammonia and the previously reported hydride
complex (PCP)Ru(CO)(H). The ability of the amido complex 2 to cleave the H−H bond is
attributed to the combination of a vacant coordination site for binding/activation of
dihydrogen and a basic amido ligand. Complex 2 also undergoes an intramolecular C−H
activation of a methyl group on the PCP ligand to yield ammonia and a cyclometalated
complex. The reaction of (PCP)Ru(CO)(Cl) with MeLi allows the isolation of (PCP)Ru(CO)(Me) (8), and complex 8 undergoes an intramolecular C−H activation analogous to the amido
complex 2 to produce methane and the cyclometalated complex. Determination of activation
parameters for the intramolecular C−H activation transformations of 2 and 8 reveal identical
ΔH⧧ {18(1) kcal/mol} with ΔS⧧ = −23(4) eu and −18(4) eu, respectively. Density functional
theory has been applied to the study of intermolecular activation of methane and dihydrogen
by (PCP‘)Ru(CO)(NH2) to yield (PCP‘)Ru(CO)(NH3)(X) (X = Me or H; PCP‘ = 2,6-(CH2PH2)2C6H3). The results indicate that the activation of dihydrogen is both exoergic and
exothermic. In contrast, the addition of a C−H bond of methane across the Ru−NH2 bond
has been calculated to be endoergic and endothermic. The surprising endoergic nature of
the methane C−H activation has been attributed to a large and unfavorable change in Ru−N
bond dissociation energy upon conversion from Ru-amido to Ru-ammine