Insights into the Free-Energy Dependence of Intramolecular Dissociative Electron Transfers

Abstract

To study the relationship between rate and driving force of intramolecular dissociative electron transfers, a series of donor−spacer−acceptor (D−Sp−A) systems has been devised and synthesized. cis-1,4-Cyclohexanedyil and a perester functional group were kept constant as the spacer and acceptor, respectively. By changing the aryl substituents of the phthalimide moiety, which served as the donor, the driving force could be varied by 0.74 eV. X-ray diffraction crystallography and ab initio conformational calculations pointed to D−Sp−A molecules having the cis-(cyclohexane) equatorial(phthalimido)−axial(perester) conformation and the same D/A orientation. The intramolecular dissociative electron-transfer process was studied by electrochemical means in N,N-dimethylformamide, in comparison with thermodynamic and kinetic information obtained with models of the acceptor and the donor. The intramolecular process consists of the electron transfer from the electrochemically generated phthalimide-moiety radical anion to the peroxide functional group. The electrochemical analysis provided clear evidence of a concerted dissociative electron-transfer mechanism, leading to the cleavage of the O−O bond. Support for this mechanism was obtained by ab initio MO calculations, which provided information about the LUMO of the acceptor and the SOMO of the donor. The intramolecular rate constants were determined and compared with the corresponding intermolecular values, the latter data being obtained by using the model molecules. As long as the effective location of the centroid of the donor SOMO does not vary significantly by changing the aryl substituent(s), the intramolecular dissociative electron transfer obeys the same main rules already highlighted for the corresponding intermolecular process. On the other hand, introduction of a nitro group drags the SOMO away from the acceptor, and consequently, the intramolecular rate drops by as much as 1.6 orders of magnitude from the expected value. Therefore, a larger solvent reorganization than for intermolecular electron transfers and the effective D/A distance and thus electronic coupling must be taken into account for quantitative predictions of intramolecular rates