The
Mn-catalyzed C–H functionalization of indoles with allenes
developed by Rueping and co-workers provides an efficient access to
various alkenylated indoles and substituted pyrroloindolones. Herein,
we present a systematic computational study to understand the mechanism
and origins of substrate-controlled chemoselectivity of the C–H
functionalization reactions (hydroarylation vs cascade cyclization).
For the disubstituted allene system, the computed mechanism consists
of three main phases: C–H activation, allene migratory insertion,
and protonation giving the hydroarylation product. All of these steps
are feasible, in agreement with the good yield under the mild experimental
conditions. On the other hand, for the trisubstituted allene system,
hydroarylation is suppressed due to the higher energy barrier for
the protonation step arising from the disfavored ligand–substrate
steric repulsions between the carboxide ligand and the substituent
group in the allene substrate; our computational results demonstrate
that, after the allene insertion leading to a seven-membered cyclometalated
intermediate, it undergoes a reaction pathway involving sequential
“ketone to enol” isomerization, a 1,4-heteroaryl shift,
and β-methoxyl elimination giving the pyrroloindolone product.
In contrast, this isomerization → heteroaryl shift →
β-methoxyl elimination process is unworkable in the disubstituted
allene system, because the protonation step takes place more favorably
owing to the lack of ligand–substrate steric interactions.
The findings taken together give an insight into the role of the ligand–substrate
interactions in directing the competitive pathways and differentiating
the energies of key transition states by steric repulsions