Comparison of NCSRM and BETR methods with respect to the top 10 pathways after mapping of 5% highest ranked genes from the reconstructed gene association networks.

Agata Michna (3140763); Anne Dietz (3140766); Herbert Braselmann (125383); Horst Zitzelsberger (626351); Julia Hess (3140769); Kristian Unger (2814205); Maria Gomolka (125359); Martin Selmansberger (3140772); Nils Blüthgen (21491); Sabine Hornhardt (736282)

dataset

Comparison of NCSRM and BETR methods with respect to the top 10 pathways after mapping of 5% highest ranked genes from the reconstructed gene association networks.

Authors: Agata Michna (3140763)
Anne Dietz (3140766)
Herbert Braselmann (125383)
Horst Zitzelsberger (626351)
Julia Hess (3140769)
Kristian Unger (2814205)
Maria Gomolka (125359)
Martin Selmansberger (3140772)
Nils Blüthgen (21491)
Sabine Hornhardt (736282)
Publication date: 28 September 2016
Publisher
Doi

Abstract

Comparison of NCSRM and BETR methods with respect to the top 10 pathways after mapping of 5% highest ranked genes from the reconstructed gene association networks.</p

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

The Francis Crick Institute

oai:figshare.com:article/38669...

Last time updated on 12/02/2018