Hirzebruch, F.

Höfer, T.

English

Hirzebruch, Friedrich

Höfer, Thomas

Max Planck Society eDoc Server

On the Euler number of an orbifold

MPG.PuRe

Math. Ann. 286, 255-260 (1990) Imam 9 Springer-Verlag 1990 On the Euler number of an orbifoid Friedrich Hirzebruch and Thomas HSfer Max-Planck-Institut ffir Mathematik, Gottfried-Claren-Strasse 26,D-5300 Bonn 3, Federal Republic of Germany Dedicated to Hans Grauert on his sixtieth birthday This short note illustrates connections between Lothar G6ttsche's results from the preceding paper and invariants for finite group actions on manifolds that have been introduced in string theory. A lecture on this was given at the MPI workshop on "Links between Geometry and Physics" at Schlol3 Ringberg, April 1989. Invariants of quotient spaces. Let G be a finite group acting on a compact differentiable manifold X. Topological invariants like Betti numbers of the quotient space X/G are well-known: 9 i a 1 b,~X/G) = dlmH (X, R) = ~ g~)~ tr(g* I H'(X, R)). The topological Euler characteristic is determined by the Euler characteristic ofthe fixed point sets Xa: 1 Physicists" formula. Viewed as an orbifold, X/G still carries omeinformation the group action. In I-DHVW1, 2; V] one finds the following string-theoretic definition of the "orbifold Euler characteristic": 1 e(X<~.h> ) e X, Here summation runs over all pairs of commuting elements in G x G, and X <g'h> denotes the common fixed point set ofg and h. The physicists are mainly interested in the case where X is a complex threefold with trivial canonical bundle and G is a finite subgroup of $U(3). They point out that in some situations where X/G has a resolution of singularities X-~Z,X/G with trivial canonical bundle e(X, G) is just the Euler characteristic of this resolution [DHVW2; St-W]. 256 F. Hirzebruch and T. H6fer In this paper we consider some well-known examples from algebraic geometry and check to what extent he formula e(X, 6) = etx/6) holds. We will also do this in the local situation of a matrix group G C U(n) acting on C", since in this non-compact ease all the invariants considered here are meaningful as well. Some elementary calculations. For a fixed g e G the elements commuting with g form the centralizer C(g). The conjugacy class [g] is a system of representatives for G/C(g), so we have ~C(g)'#(Eg])=lGI. Since simultaneous conjugation ofg and h by some element of G leaves e(X <~'h>) fixed, using the classical formula for e(X/G) we can write e(X, G) as a sum over the conjugacy classes of G: 1 e(x ,~)= ~-~ y #([g]) 2 e(X <"'h>) [g] h ~ c(g) 1 = - -  • ~([g])' 4~ C(g)'e(X"/C(g)). tGI tgl So we get an equivalent definition which sometimes is more useful than the original one: e(X, G)= Y, e(X"/C(g)) [g] For a free action we immediately get e(X, G)=e(X/G), and we also see that some assumption is necessary: For a cyclic group of order n acting on PI(C) with two fixed points, the quotient is PI(C) again, whereas e(P 1, G)=e(P1)+(n - 1). 2=2n. Loop spaces. For g e G we consider the space of paths -~(x, g): = {~: It --,x I ~(t + 1) = g~(t)}. G acts on the disjoint union of these spaces by (h~)(t):= h. ~(t). Obviously h transforms .o~(X, g) into ~(X, hgh-1). We form the quotient The real numbers act on the ~(X, g) and on ~(X, G) by transforming a(t) to 9 (t+c), The fixed point set of this action is U (X,lC(g))czetx, G), On the Euler number of an orbifold 257 where X ~ is embedded in .W(X, g) as the set of constant paths. This corresponds tothe inclusion of X in the ordinary loop space La(X) as the fixed point set of the obvious S 1-action. On each component Le(X, g) our R-action is in fact an action of S 1 as well because ~t(t + ord(g))= ct(t). So we can take the Euler characteristic with respect to this action, i.e. the Euler characteristic of the fixed point set, and get the orbifold invariant e(X, G). Quotient singularities. If G is a finite subgroup of U(n) acting on C', then every fixed point set is contractible. Thus e(C", G) equals the number of conjugacy classes, i.e. the number of isomorphism classes of irreducible representations of G. If in particular G CSU(2), then the corresponding 2-dimensional quotient singularity has a minimal resolution C~G by a configuration of rational (-2)-curves. This is equivalent to C:/G having t._~dvial canonical bundle. If the number of exceptional curves is k, then e(CZ/G)=k+l. Now the McKay correspondence states that the number of non-trivial irreducible representations of G equals this number k of exceptional curves, hence e(C2/G) = k + 1 = e(C 2, G). For resolution configurations containing other than (-2)-curves and therefore having non-trivial canonical divisor the result is false: If G is a cyclic subgroup of U(2) generated by exp (21ti p ) 0 q~ , 0 exp 2~i n, p, q relatively prime to n, we have e(C 2,G)=n. But now the resolution graph consists of rational curves with self-intersections - as determined by the continued n f ract ion-  =a j  where r=-p/qmodn, 0<r<n.  In the case Gs r 1 '  a2 - - - -  considered above we have r= n -1 ,  the continued fraction has length n -1  with entri.__zes as = 2, and the result is true. But for p=q there is just one (-n)-curve, so e(C2/G)=2 equals e(C 2, G)=n only if n=2, i.e. GCSU(2). In higher dimensions the same phenomenon occurs: IfG C SU(n) is generated by a diagonal matrix diag (( ..... 0 for ( a primitive n-th root of unity, then a resoluti.__.on of (C"/G) consists of a single P"-  l with normal bundle d~(- n) and we have e(C"/G) = n = e(C", G). Kummer surfaces. The quotient of an abelian surface (two-dimensional complex torus) X by the involution z: x ~ - x has 16 singularities corresponding to the 16 fixed points of z. Eac_~_h singularity can be resolved by a single (-2)-curve. This minimal resolution X/(~) is called the Kummer surface of X. It is a K3-surface with Euler characteristic 24. On the other hand e(X, (v))= 89 e(X')) = 89 A Calabi-Yaumanifold. Thisisacorrespondingexampleindimensionthree. IfCis the elliptic urve with complex multiplication oforder 3, the cyclic group G = (Q) 258 F. H i rzebruch and T. H6fer  of order 3 operates also on X = C x C x C with 27 fixed points. As described above, each of the corresponding singularities i resolved by a P', and we get e(X, G) =~(e(X) + 8- e(X~ =~(0 + 8- 27) = 72, e(XIG) = e(X/G)-- 27 + 27' e(P 2) = ~(e(X) + 2. e(XQ)) + 54 = 72. These global results are not too surprising ffone has the local results for quotient singularities, since e(X, G)=e(Xt, G)+e(X2, G) for reasonable disjoint unions X=X1uX2 of G-invariant subsets for which the Euler characteristic is defined. G6ttsche's formula [G1, 2]. One important class of examples consists in the symmetric powers S ~") of a smooth (complex-)algebraic surface S. The symmetric power is a quotient of the cartesian power S" by the obvious action of the symmetric group 5r Algebraic Geometry provides a canonical resolution Hilb" (S) =: S E"J L S t") by the Hilbert scheme of finite subsehemes of length n. The action leaves the canonical divisor of S" invariant, so it descends to a canonical divisor on S ~"). This divisor is not affected by the resolution, i.e. f*~gs(.~ = OFs,.~. If in particular S has 9 "[.l bu  trivial canomca l  divisor then so does ~ , t we  will see that e(S t"{) = e(Sn, 5r holds in general. In his Diplom thesis G6ttsche computed the Betti numbers of S t"~ for an algebraic surface S. His main result is t ~ P(s,~)'~ a=O k=l  where P(X,z) denotes the modified Poincar6 polynomial P(X,z)=P(X,-z) = 5~(-l)lb,(X)z ~.For the Euler characteristic e(X)= P(X, 1)'this simplifies to ~.. e(Sl"l).t"=exp (e(S) ~ 1 t i ,=0 i=x i 1--t i] i=1 i k= l  o p(.s, lo ,, ,.,) = I~ (1 -0 )  -'r k=l  Compare these formulae to those obtained for symmetric powers by Macdonald [M;Z], for example: ~s"~. e '=0 -0  -'~s' . Verification of e(St'~)=e(S ", 5e,) for symmetric powers of algebraic surfaces. Let .gl(n) denote the set of all series (00=(a,, ~2 .... ) of nonnegative integers with Y~i~--n, and .4/:= U..Cg(n). The conjugaoy class of a permutation a~5~, is | On the Euler number of an orbifold 259 determined by its type (ct)=(~l,a 2 .... )e~C/(n) where ~i denotes the number of /-cycles in a. Its fixed point set in S n consists of all n-tuples (xl, ...,x,) with x~ =...  = x~, for any/-cycle (el...vi) in a and is therefore isomorphic to I-I S% Any i element 9 in the centralizer C(a) permutes the cycles of cr respecting their length, i.e. it induces permutations ~of cti elements. Thus C(cr) maps onto I] re ,  the kernel i acting trivially on H S% Therefore (Sn)'/C(a} = I~ StY~ is a product of symmetric i i powers. We can compute (S", ~,) using the formulae of Macdonald and GSttsche: e(SL S,~ 9 t~ ~ E e((S")'/C(~)), t" n=O n=O [tr] C S in  =o=o E FI = ~ [] (e(S~"l).ti'9 (~)~.~q i >_ l = [I ~ (e(S'~")" : ') i= l  ~ i=O 1 = i=I ~ (1-tl) e(s) = ~. e(Sl~l).t ". n=O Graeme Segal's interpretation (Equivariant K-theory). Equivariant K-theory of (X, G) and ordinary K-theory of the fixed point sets are related by an isomorphism of complex vector spaces IS] KG(X)| G K(X#/C(g))| [a] The image of an equivariant vector bundle E on X is defined as follows: On EIx~ the element g still acts, leaving the base points fixed. Thus E]x~ splits into a direct sum of vector bundles consisting of the eigenspaces of g in every fibre. We put the corresponding eigenvalue in the second factor and get an element in K(Xg)| Now as C(g) still acts on X g, we can take the invariants and get something in K(Xg)C(g)|174 The same also holds for K~(X), and by the standard fact that the Euler characteristic of the complex K*(X) equals the topological Euler characteristic we can deduce e(K*(X)| C) = dim c K~174 dim c K~(X)| = Y. e(Xg/C(g)) [gl = e(X, G). However, since the isomorphism does not commute with Adams operations, we cannot say anything about the single Betti numbers. Acknowledgements. We would like to thank Graeme Segal and Peter Slodowy for fruitful discussions. 260 F. Hirzebrueh and T. H6fer References ['DHVW1] L. Dixon, J. Harvey, C. Vafa, E. Witten: Strings on orbifolds. I. Nucl. Phys. B 261, 678-686 0985) [DHVW2] L. Dixon, J. Harvey, C. Vafa, E. Witten: Strings on orbifolds. II. NucL Phys. B 274, 285-314 (1986) ['G1] L. G6ttsche: Die Betti-Zahlen des Hilbert-Schemas forUnterschemata der L/inge n einer glatten Fl/iche. Diplomarbeit, Bonn 1988 [G2] L. G6ttsche: The Betti numbers of the Hilbert scheme of points on a smooth projective surface. Math. Ann. 286, 193-207 (1990) [M] I.G. Macdonald: The Poincar6 polynomial of a symmetric product. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 58, 563-568 (1962) IS] G. Segal: Letter to F. Hirzebruch, December 1988. (Joint paper with M. Atiyah in preparation) [St-W] A. Strominger, E. Witten: New manifolds for superstring compactification. Com- mun. Math. Phys. 101, 341-361 (1985) tV] C. Vafa: Strings on orb/folds. In: Links between geometry and mathematical physics, Sehlol] Ringberg 1987. MPI Preprint 87-58 [Z] D. Zagier: Equivariant Pontrjagin classes and application to orbit spaces. (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 290). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1972 Received July 17, 1989 

On the Euler number of an orbifold

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Max Planck Society eDoc Server

MPG.PuRe